theory LFex
imports Nominal QuotMain
begin

atom_decl name ident

nominal_datatype kind = 
    Type
  | KPi "ty" "name" "kind"
and ty =  
    TConst "ident"
  | TApp "ty" "trm"
  | TPi "ty" "name" "ty"
and trm = 
    Const "ident"
  | Var "name"
  | App "trm" "trm"
  | Lam "ty" "name" "trm" 

function
    fv_kind :: "kind \<Rightarrow> name set"
and fv_ty   :: "ty \<Rightarrow> name set"
and fv_trm  :: "trm \<Rightarrow> name set"
where
  "fv_kind (Type) = {}"
| "fv_kind (KPi A x K) = (fv_ty A) \<union> ((fv_kind K) - {x})"
| "fv_ty (TConst i) = {}"
| "fv_ty (TApp A M) = (fv_ty A) \<union> (fv_trm M)"
| "fv_ty (TPi A x B) = (fv_ty A) \<union> ((fv_ty B) - {x})"
| "fv_trm (Const i) = {}"
| "fv_trm (Var x) = {x}"
| "fv_trm (App M N) = (fv_trm M) \<union> (fv_trm N)"
| "fv_trm (Lam A x M) = (fv_ty A) \<union> ((fv_trm M) - {x})"
sorry

termination fv_kind sorry

inductive
    akind :: "kind \<Rightarrow> kind \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<approx>ki _" [100, 100] 100)
and aty   :: "ty \<Rightarrow> ty \<Rightarrow> bool"     ("_ \<approx>ty _" [100, 100] 100)
and atrm  :: "trm \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> bool"   ("_ \<approx>tr _" [100, 100] 100)
where
  a1:  "(Type) \<approx>ki (Type)"
| a21: "\<lbrakk>A \<approx>ty A'; K \<approx>ki K'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (KPi A x K) \<approx>ki (KPi A' x K')"
| a22: "\<lbrakk>A \<approx>ty A'; K \<approx>ki ([(x,x')]\<bullet>K'); x \<notin> (fv_ty A'); x \<notin> ((fv_kind K') - {x'})\<rbrakk> 
        \<Longrightarrow> (KPi A x K) \<approx>ki (KPi A' x' K')"
| a3:  "i = j \<Longrightarrow> (TConst i) \<approx>ty (TConst j)"
| a4:  "\<lbrakk>A \<approx>ty A'; M \<approx>tr M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (TApp A M) \<approx>ty (TApp A' M')"
| a51: "\<lbrakk>A \<approx>ty A'; B \<approx>ty B'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (TPi A x B) \<approx>ty (TPi A' x B')"
| a52: "\<lbrakk>A \<approx>ty A'; B \<approx>ty ([(x,x')]\<bullet>B'); x \<notin> (fv_ty B'); x \<notin> ((fv_ty B') - {x'})\<rbrakk> 
        \<Longrightarrow> (TPi A x B) \<approx>ty (TPi A' x' B')"
| a6:  "i = j \<Longrightarrow> (Const i) \<approx>trm (Const j)"
| a7:  "x = y \<Longrightarrow> (Var x) \<approx>trm (Var y)"
| a8:  "\<lbrakk>M \<approx>trm M'; N \<approx>tr N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (App M N) \<approx>tr (App M' N')"
| a91: "\<lbrakk>A \<approx>ty A'; M \<approx>tr M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (Lam A x M) \<approx>tr (Lam A' x M')"
| a92: "\<lbrakk>A \<approx>ty A'; M \<approx>tr ([(x,x')]\<bullet>M'); x \<notin> (fv_ty B'); x \<notin> ((fv_trm M') - {x'})\<rbrakk> 
        \<Longrightarrow> (Lam A x M) \<approx>tr (Lam A' x' M')"

lemma al_refl:
  fixes K::"kind" 
  and   A::"ty"
  and   M::"trm"
  shows "K \<approx>ki K"
  and   "A \<approx>ty A"
  and   "M \<approx>tr M"
  apply(induct K and A and M rule: kind_ty_trm.inducts)
  apply(auto intro: akind_aty_atrm.intros)
  done

lemma alpha_EQUIVs:
  shows "EQUIV akind"
  and   "EQUIV aty"
  and   "EQUIV atrm"
sorry

quotient KIND = kind / akind
  by (rule alpha_EQUIVs)

quotient TY = ty / aty
   and   TRM = trm / atrm
  by (auto intro: alpha_EQUIVs)

print_quotients

quotient_def 
  TYP :: "KIND"
where
  "TYP \<equiv> Type"

quotient_def 
  KPI :: "TY \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> KIND \<Rightarrow> KIND"
where
  "KPI \<equiv> KPi"

quotient_def 
  TCONST :: "ident \<Rightarrow> TY"
where
  "TCONST \<equiv> TConst"

quotient_def 
  TAPP :: "TY \<Rightarrow> TRM \<Rightarrow> TY"
where
  "TAPP \<equiv> TApp"

quotient_def 
  TPI :: "TY \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> TY \<Rightarrow> TY"
where
  "TPI \<equiv> TPi"

(* FIXME: does not work with CONST *)
quotient_def 
  CONS :: "ident \<Rightarrow> TRM"
where
  "CONS \<equiv> Const"

quotient_def 
  VAR :: "name \<Rightarrow> TRM"
where
  "VAR \<equiv> Var"

quotient_def 
  APP :: "TRM \<Rightarrow> TRM \<Rightarrow> TRM"
where
  "APP \<equiv> App"

quotient_def 
  LAM :: "TY \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> TRM \<Rightarrow> TRM"
where
  "LAM \<equiv> Lam"

thm TYP_def
thm KPI_def
thm TCONST_def
thm TAPP_def
thm TPI_def
thm VAR_def
thm CONS_def
thm APP_def
thm LAM_def

(* FIXME: print out a warning if the type contains a liftet type, like kind \<Rightarrow> name set *)
quotient_def 
  FV_kind :: "KIND \<Rightarrow> name set"
where
  "FV_kind \<equiv> fv_kind"

quotient_def 
  FV_ty :: "TY \<Rightarrow> name set"
where
  "FV_ty \<equiv> fv_ty"

quotient_def 
  FV_trm :: "TRM \<Rightarrow> name set"
where
  "FV_trm \<equiv> fv_trm"

thm FV_kind_def
thm FV_ty_def
thm FV_trm_def

(* FIXME: does not work yet *)
overloading
    perm_kind \<equiv> "perm :: 'x prm \<Rightarrow> KIND \<Rightarrow> KIND"   (unchecked)
    perm_ty   \<equiv> "perm :: 'x prm \<Rightarrow> TY \<Rightarrow> TY"       (unchecked)
    perm_trm  \<equiv> "perm :: 'x prm \<Rightarrow> TRM \<Rightarrow> TRM"     (unchecked) 
begin

quotient_def 
  perm_kind :: "'x prm \<Rightarrow> KIND \<Rightarrow> KIND"
where
  "perm_kind \<equiv> (perm::'x prm \<Rightarrow> kind \<Rightarrow> kind)"

quotient_def 
  perm_ty :: "'x prm \<Rightarrow> TY \<Rightarrow> TY"
where
  "perm_ty \<equiv> (perm::'x prm \<Rightarrow> ty \<Rightarrow> ty)"

quotient_def 
  perm_trm :: "'x prm \<Rightarrow> TRM \<Rightarrow> TRM"
where
  "perm_trm \<equiv> (perm::'x prm \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> trm)"

(* TODO/FIXME: Think whether these RSP theorems are true. *)
lemma kpi_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(aty ===> op = ===> akind ===> akind) KPi KPi" sorry
lemma tconst_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(op = ===> aty) TConst TConst" sorry
lemma tapp_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(aty ===> atrm ===> aty) TApp TApp" sorry
lemma tpi_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(aty ===> op = ===> aty ===> aty) TPi TPi" sorry
lemma var_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(op = ===> atrm) Var Var" sorry
lemma app_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(atrm ===> atrm ===> atrm) App App" sorry
lemma const_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(op = ===> atrm) Const Const" sorry
lemma lam_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(aty ===> op = ===> atrm ===> atrm) Lam Lam" sorry

lemma perm_kind_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(op = ===> akind ===> akind) op \<bullet> op \<bullet>" sorry
lemma perm_ty_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(op = ===> aty ===> aty) op \<bullet> op \<bullet>" sorry
lemma perm_trm_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(op = ===> atrm ===> atrm) op \<bullet> op \<bullet>" sorry

lemma fv_ty_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(aty ===> op =) fv_ty fv_ty" sorry
lemma fv_kind_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(akind ===> op =) fv_kind fv_kind" sorry
lemma fv_trm_rsp[quot_rsp]: 
  "(atrm ===> op =) fv_trm fv_trm" sorry


thm akind_aty_atrm.induct
thm kind_ty_trm.induct

ML {*
  val quot = @{thms QUOTIENT_KIND QUOTIENT_TY QUOTIENT_TRM}
  val rel_refl = map (fn x => @{thm EQUIV_REFL} OF [x]) @{thms alpha_EQUIVs}
  val trans2 = map (fn x => @{thm equiv_trans2} OF [x]) @{thms alpha_EQUIVs}
  val reps_same = map (fn x => @{thm QUOTIENT_REL_REP} OF [x]) quot
  val meta_reps_same = map (fn x => @{thm eq_reflection} OF [x]) reps_same
*}

lemma 
  assumes a0:
  "P1 TYP TYP"
  and a1: 
  "\<And>A A' K K' x. \<lbrakk>(A::TY) = A'; P2 A A'; (K::KIND) = K'; P1 K K'\<rbrakk> 
  \<Longrightarrow> P1 (KPI A x K) (KPI A' x K')"
  and a2:    
  "\<And>A A' K K' x x'. \<lbrakk>(A ::TY) = A'; P2 A A'; (K :: KIND) = ([(x, x')] \<bullet> K'); P1 K ([(x, x')] \<bullet> K'); 
    x \<notin> FV_ty A'; x \<notin> FV_kind K' - {x'}\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P1 (KPI A x K) (KPI A' x' K')"
  and a3: 
  "\<And>i j. i = j \<Longrightarrow> P2 (TCONST i) (TCONST j)"
  and a4:
  "\<And>A A' M M'. \<lbrakk>(A ::TY) = A'; P2 A A'; (M :: TRM) = M'; P3 M M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P2 (TAPP A M) (TAPP A' M')"
  and a5:
  "\<And>A A' B B' x. \<lbrakk>(A ::TY) = A'; P2 A A'; (B ::TY) = B'; P2 B B'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P2 (TPI A x B) (TPI A' x B')"
  and a6:
  "\<And>A A' B x x' B'. \<lbrakk>(A ::TY) = A'; P2 A A'; (B ::TY) = ([(x, x')] \<bullet> B'); P2 B ([(x, x')] \<bullet> B'); 
  x \<notin> FV_ty B'; x \<notin> FV_ty B' - {x'}\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P2 (TPI A x B) (TPI A' x' B')"
  and a7:
  "\<And>i j m. i = j \<Longrightarrow> P3 (CONS i) (m (CONS j))"
  and a8:
  "\<And>x y m. x = y \<Longrightarrow> P3 (VAR x) (m (VAR y))"
  and a9:
  "\<And>M m M' N N'. \<lbrakk>(M :: TRM) = m M'; P3 M (m M'); (N :: TRM) = N'; P3 N N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P3 (APP M N) (APP M' N')"
  and a10: 
  "\<And>A A' M M' x. \<lbrakk>(A ::TY) = A'; P2 A A'; (M :: TRM) = M'; P3 M M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P3 (LAM A x M) (LAM A' x M')"
  and a11:
  "\<And>A A' M x x' M' B'. \<lbrakk>(A ::TY) = A'; P2 A A'; (M :: TRM) = ([(x, x')] \<bullet> M'); P3 M ([(x, x')] \<bullet> M'); 
  x \<notin> FV_ty B'; x \<notin> FV_trm M' - {x'}\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P3 (LAM A x M) (LAM A' x' M')"
  shows "((x1 :: KIND) = x2 \<longrightarrow> P1 x1 x2) \<and>
         ((x3 ::TY) = x4 \<longrightarrow> P2 x3 x4) \<and> 
         ((x5 :: TRM) = x6 \<longrightarrow> P3 x5 x6)"
using a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 a10 a11
apply - 
apply(tactic {* procedure_tac @{context} @{thm akind_aty_atrm.induct} 1 *})
apply(tactic {* regularize_tac @{context} @{thms alpha_EQUIVs} 1 *})
prefer 2
apply(tactic {* clean_tac @{context} quot 1 *})
(*
Profiling:
ML_prf {* fun ith i =  (#concl (fst (Subgoal.focus @{context} i (#goal (Isar.goal ()))))) *}
ML_prf {* profile 2 Seq.list_of ((clean_tac @{context} quot defs 1) (ith 3)) *}
ML_prf {* profile 2 Seq.list_of ((regularize_tac @{context} @{thms alpha_EQUIVs} 1) (ith 1)) *}
ML_prf {* PolyML.profiling 1 *}
ML_prf {* profile 2 Seq.list_of ((all_inj_repabs_tac @{context} quot rel_refl trans2 1) (#goal (Isar.goal ()))) *}
*)
apply(tactic {* all_inj_repabs_tac' @{context} quot rel_refl trans2 1 *})
(*apply(tactic {* all_inj_repabs_tac @{context} quot rel_refl trans2 1 *})*)
done

(* Does not work:
lemma
  assumes a0: "P1 TYP"
  and     a1: "\<And>ty name kind. \<lbrakk>P2 ty; P1 kind\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P1 (KPI ty name kind)"
  and     a2: "\<And>id. P2 (TCONST id)"
  and     a3: "\<And>ty trm. \<lbrakk>P2 ty; P3 trm\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P2 (TAPP ty trm)"
  and     a4: "\<And>ty1 name ty2. \<lbrakk>P2 ty1; P2 ty2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P2 (TPI ty1 name ty2)"
  and     a5: "\<And>id. P3 (CONS id)"
  and     a6: "\<And>name. P3 (VAR name)"
  and     a7: "\<And>trm1 trm2. \<lbrakk>P3 trm1; P3 trm2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P3 (APP trm1 trm2)"
  and     a8: "\<And>ty name trm. \<lbrakk>P2 ty; P3 trm\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P3 (LAM ty name trm)"
  shows "P1 mkind \<and> P2 mty \<and> P3 mtrm"
using a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8
*)

lemma "\<lbrakk>P1 TYP;
  \<And>ty name kind. \<lbrakk>P2 ty; P1 kind\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P1 (KPI ty name kind);
  \<And>id. P2 (TCONST id);
  \<And>ty trm. \<lbrakk>P2 ty; P3 trm\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P2 (TAPP ty trm);
  \<And>ty1 name ty2. \<lbrakk>P2 ty1; P2 ty2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P2 (TPI ty1 name ty2);
  \<And>id. P3 (CONS id); \<And>name. P3 (VAR name);
  \<And>trm1 trm2. \<lbrakk>P3 trm1; P3 trm2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P3 (APP trm1 trm2);
  \<And>ty name trm. \<lbrakk>P2 ty; P3 trm\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P3 (LAM ty name trm)\<rbrakk>
  \<Longrightarrow> P1 mkind \<and> P2 mty \<and> P3 mtrm"
apply(tactic {* lift_tac @{context} @{thm kind_ty_trm.induct} @{thms alpha_EQUIVs} quot 1 *})
done

print_quotients

end