changed the eqvt-tac to move only outermost permutations inside; added tracing infrastructure for the eqvt-tac
(* Title: Nominal2_Eqvt
Authors: Brian Huffman, Christian Urban
Equivariance, Supp and Fresh Lemmas for Operators.
(Contains most, but not all such lemmas.)
*)
theory Nominal2_Eqvt
imports Nominal2_Base Nominal2_Atoms
uses ("nominal_thmdecls.ML")
("nominal_permeq.ML")
begin
section {* Logical Operators *}
lemma eq_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (x = y) \<longleftrightarrow> (p \<bullet> x) = (p \<bullet> y)"
unfolding permute_eq_iff permute_bool_def ..
lemma if_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (if b then x else y) = (if p \<bullet> b then p \<bullet> x else p \<bullet> y)"
by (simp add: permute_fun_def permute_bool_def)
lemma True_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> True = True"
unfolding permute_bool_def ..
lemma False_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> False = False"
unfolding permute_bool_def ..
lemma imp_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (A \<longrightarrow> B) = ((p \<bullet> A) \<longrightarrow> (p \<bullet> B))"
by (simp add: permute_bool_def)
lemma conj_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (A \<and> B) = ((p \<bullet> A) \<and> (p \<bullet> B))"
by (simp add: permute_bool_def)
lemma disj_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (A \<or> B) = ((p \<bullet> A) \<or> (p \<bullet> B))"
by (simp add: permute_bool_def)
lemma Not_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (\<not> A) = (\<not> (p \<bullet> A))"
by (simp add: permute_bool_def)
lemma all_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (\<forall>x. P x) = (\<forall>x. (p \<bullet> P) x)"
unfolding permute_fun_def permute_bool_def
by (auto, drule_tac x="p \<bullet> x" in spec, simp)
lemma all_eqvt2:
shows "p \<bullet> (\<forall>x. P x) = (\<forall>x. p \<bullet> P (- p \<bullet> x))"
unfolding permute_fun_def permute_bool_def
by (auto, drule_tac x="p \<bullet> x" in spec, simp)
lemma ex_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (\<exists>x. P x) = (\<exists>x. (p \<bullet> P) x)"
unfolding permute_fun_def permute_bool_def
by (auto, rule_tac x="p \<bullet> x" in exI, simp)
lemma ex_eqvt2:
shows "p \<bullet> (\<exists>x. P x) = (\<exists>x. p \<bullet> P (- p \<bullet> x))"
unfolding permute_fun_def permute_bool_def
by (auto, rule_tac x="p \<bullet> x" in exI, simp)
lemma ex1_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (\<exists>!x. P x) = (\<exists>!x. (p \<bullet> P) x)"
unfolding Ex1_def
by (simp add: ex_eqvt permute_fun_def conj_eqvt all_eqvt imp_eqvt eq_eqvt)
lemma ex1_eqvt2:
shows "p \<bullet> (\<exists>!x. P x) = (\<exists>!x. p \<bullet> P (- p \<bullet> x))"
unfolding Ex1_def ex_eqvt2 conj_eqvt all_eqvt2 imp_eqvt eq_eqvt
by simp
lemma the_eqvt:
assumes unique: "\<exists>!x. P x"
shows "(p \<bullet> (THE x. P x)) = (THE x. p \<bullet> P (- p \<bullet> x))"
apply(rule the1_equality [symmetric])
apply(simp add: ex1_eqvt2[symmetric])
apply(simp add: permute_bool_def unique)
apply(simp add: permute_bool_def)
apply(rule theI'[OF unique])
done
section {* Set Operations *}
lemma mem_permute_iff:
shows "(p \<bullet> x) \<in> (p \<bullet> X) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> X"
unfolding mem_def permute_fun_def permute_bool_def
by simp
lemma mem_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (x \<in> A) \<longleftrightarrow> (p \<bullet> x) \<in> (p \<bullet> A)"
unfolding mem_permute_iff permute_bool_def by simp
lemma not_mem_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (x \<notin> A) \<longleftrightarrow> (p \<bullet> x) \<notin> (p \<bullet> A)"
unfolding mem_def permute_fun_def by (simp add: Not_eqvt)
lemma Collect_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> {x. P x} = {x. (p \<bullet> P) x}"
unfolding Collect_def permute_fun_def ..
lemma Collect_eqvt2:
shows "p \<bullet> {x. P x} = {x. p \<bullet> (P (-p \<bullet> x))}"
unfolding Collect_def permute_fun_def ..
lemma empty_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> {} = {}"
unfolding empty_def Collect_eqvt2 False_eqvt ..
lemma supp_set_empty:
shows "supp {} = {}"
by (simp add: supp_def empty_eqvt)
lemma fresh_set_empty:
shows "a \<sharp> {}"
by (simp add: fresh_def supp_set_empty)
lemma UNIV_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> UNIV = UNIV"
unfolding UNIV_def Collect_eqvt2 True_eqvt ..
lemma union_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (A \<union> B) = (p \<bullet> A) \<union> (p \<bullet> B)"
unfolding Un_def Collect_eqvt2 disj_eqvt mem_eqvt by simp
lemma inter_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (A \<inter> B) = (p \<bullet> A) \<inter> (p \<bullet> B)"
unfolding Int_def Collect_eqvt2 conj_eqvt mem_eqvt by simp
lemma Diff_eqvt:
fixes A B :: "'a::pt set"
shows "p \<bullet> (A - B) = p \<bullet> A - p \<bullet> B"
unfolding set_diff_eq Collect_eqvt2 conj_eqvt Not_eqvt mem_eqvt by simp
lemma Compl_eqvt:
fixes A :: "'a::pt set"
shows "p \<bullet> (- A) = - (p \<bullet> A)"
unfolding Compl_eq_Diff_UNIV Diff_eqvt UNIV_eqvt ..
lemma insert_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (insert x A) = insert (p \<bullet> x) (p \<bullet> A)"
unfolding permute_set_eq_image image_insert ..
lemma vimage_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (f -` A) = (p \<bullet> f) -` (p \<bullet> A)"
unfolding vimage_def permute_fun_def [where f=f]
unfolding Collect_eqvt2 mem_eqvt ..
lemma image_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (f ` A) = (p \<bullet> f) ` (p \<bullet> A)"
unfolding permute_set_eq_image
unfolding permute_fun_def [where f=f]
by (simp add: image_image)
lemma finite_permute_iff:
shows "finite (p \<bullet> A) \<longleftrightarrow> finite A"
unfolding permute_set_eq_vimage
using bij_permute by (rule finite_vimage_iff)
lemma finite_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> finite A = finite (p \<bullet> A)"
unfolding finite_permute_iff permute_bool_def ..
section {* List Operations *}
lemma append_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (xs @ ys) = (p \<bullet> xs) @ (p \<bullet> ys)"
by (induct xs) auto
lemma supp_append:
shows "supp (xs @ ys) = supp xs \<union> supp ys"
by (induct xs) (auto simp add: supp_Nil supp_Cons)
lemma fresh_append:
shows "a \<sharp> (xs @ ys) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> xs \<and> a \<sharp> ys"
by (induct xs) (simp_all add: fresh_Nil fresh_Cons)
lemma rev_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (rev xs) = rev (p \<bullet> xs)"
by (induct xs) (simp_all add: append_eqvt)
lemma supp_rev:
shows "supp (rev xs) = supp xs"
by (induct xs) (auto simp add: supp_append supp_Cons supp_Nil)
lemma fresh_rev:
shows "a \<sharp> rev xs \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> xs"
by (induct xs) (auto simp add: fresh_append fresh_Cons fresh_Nil)
lemma set_eqvt:
shows "p \<bullet> (set xs) = set (p \<bullet> xs)"
by (induct xs) (simp_all add: empty_eqvt insert_eqvt)
(* needs finite support premise
lemma supp_set:
fixes x :: "'a::pt"
shows "supp (set xs) = supp xs"
*)
section {* Product Operations *}
lemma fst_eqvt:
"p \<bullet> (fst x) = fst (p \<bullet> x)"
by (cases x) simp
lemma snd_eqvt:
"p \<bullet> (snd x) = snd (p \<bullet> x)"
by (cases x) simp
section {* Units *}
lemma supp_unit:
shows "supp () = {}"
by (simp add: supp_def)
lemma fresh_unit:
shows "a \<sharp> ()"
by (simp add: fresh_def supp_unit)
lemma permute_eqvt_raw:
shows "p \<bullet> permute = permute"
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq permute_fun_def)
apply(subst permute_eqvt)
apply(simp)
done
section {* Equivariance automation *}
text {* Setup of the theorem attributes @{text eqvt} and @{text eqvt_force} *}
use "nominal_thmdecls.ML"
setup "Nominal_ThmDecls.setup"
lemmas [eqvt] =
(* connectives *)
eq_eqvt if_eqvt imp_eqvt disj_eqvt conj_eqvt Not_eqvt
True_eqvt False_eqvt ex_eqvt all_eqvt ex1_eqvt
imp_eqvt [folded induct_implies_def]
(* nominal *)
supp_eqvt fresh_eqvt
(* datatypes *)
permute_prod.simps append_eqvt rev_eqvt set_eqvt
fst_eqvt snd_eqvt Pair_eqvt
(* sets *)
empty_eqvt UNIV_eqvt union_eqvt inter_eqvt mem_eqvt
Diff_eqvt Compl_eqvt insert_eqvt Collect_eqvt image_eqvt
atom_eqvt add_perm_eqvt
lemmas [eqvt_raw] =
permute_eqvt_raw[THEN eq_reflection] (* the normal version of this lemma loops *)
thm eqvts
thm eqvts_raw
text {* helper lemmas for the eqvt_tac *}
definition
"unpermute p = permute (- p)"
lemma eqvt_apply:
fixes f :: "'a::pt \<Rightarrow> 'b::pt"
and x :: "'a::pt"
shows "p \<bullet> (f x) \<equiv> (p \<bullet> f) (p \<bullet> x)"
unfolding permute_fun_def by simp
lemma eqvt_lambda:
fixes f :: "'a::pt \<Rightarrow> 'b::pt"
shows "p \<bullet> (\<lambda>x. f x) \<equiv> (\<lambda>x. p \<bullet> (f (unpermute p x)))"
unfolding permute_fun_def unpermute_def by simp
lemma eqvt_bound:
shows "p \<bullet> unpermute p x \<equiv> x"
unfolding unpermute_def by simp
ML {* @{const Trueprop} *}
use "nominal_permeq.ML"
setup Nominal_Permeq.setup
method_setup perm_simp =
{* Attrib.thms >> (fn thms => fn ctxt => SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (Nominal_Permeq.eqvt_tac ctxt thms))) *}
{* pushes permutations inside *}
declare [[trace_eqvt = true]]
lemma
fixes B::"'a::pt"
shows "p \<bullet> (B = C)"
apply(perm_simp)
oops
lemma
fixes B::"bool"
shows "p \<bullet> (B = C)"
apply(perm_simp)
oops
lemma
fixes B::"bool"
shows "p \<bullet> (A \<longrightarrow> B = C)"
apply (perm_simp)
oops
lemma
shows "p \<bullet> (\<lambda>(x::'a::pt). A \<longrightarrow> (B::'a \<Rightarrow> bool) x = C) = foo"
apply(perm_simp)
oops
lemma
shows "p \<bullet> (\<lambda>B::bool. A \<longrightarrow> (B = C)) = foo"
apply (perm_simp)
oops
lemma
shows "p \<bullet> (\<lambda>x y. \<exists>z. x = z \<and> x = y \<longrightarrow> z \<noteq> x) = foo"
apply (perm_simp)
oops
lemma
shows "p \<bullet> (\<lambda>f x. f (g (f x))) = foo"
apply (perm_simp)
oops
lemma
fixes p q::"perm"
and x::"'a::pt"
shows "p \<bullet> (q \<bullet> x) = foo"
apply(perm_simp)
oops
lemma
fixes p q r::"perm"
and x::"'a::pt"
shows "p \<bullet> (q \<bullet> r \<bullet> x) = foo"
apply(perm_simp)
oops
lemma
fixes p r::"perm"
shows "p \<bullet> (\<lambda>q::perm. q \<bullet> (r \<bullet> x)) = foo"
apply (perm_simp)
oops
lemma
fixes p q r::"perm"
and x::"'a::pt"
shows "p \<bullet> (q \<bullet> r \<bullet> x) = foo"
apply(perm_simp)
oops
lemma
fixes C D::"bool"
shows "B (p \<bullet> (C = D))"
apply(perm_simp)
oops
declare [[trace_eqvt = false]]
text {* Problem: there is no raw eqvt-rule for The *}
lemma "p \<bullet> (THE x. P x) = foo"
apply(perm_simp)
oops
end