FSet.thy
author Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:41:09 +0100
changeset 536 44fa9df44e6f
parent 529 6348c2a57ec2
child 547 b0809b256a88
child 549 f178958d3d81
permissions -rw-r--r--
More code cleaning and name changes

theory FSet
imports QuotMain
begin

inductive
  list_eq (infix "\<approx>" 50)
where
  "a#b#xs \<approx> b#a#xs"
| "[] \<approx> []"
| "xs \<approx> ys \<Longrightarrow> ys \<approx> xs"
| "a#a#xs \<approx> a#xs"
| "xs \<approx> ys \<Longrightarrow> a#xs \<approx> a#ys"
| "\<lbrakk>xs1 \<approx> xs2; xs2 \<approx> xs3\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> xs1 \<approx> xs3"

lemma list_eq_refl:
  shows "xs \<approx> xs"
  by (induct xs) (auto intro: list_eq.intros)

lemma equivp_list_eq:
  shows "equivp list_eq"
  unfolding equivp_reflp_symp_transp reflp_def symp_def transp_def
  apply(auto intro: list_eq.intros list_eq_refl)
  done

quotient fset = "'a list" / "list_eq"
  apply(rule equivp_list_eq)
  done

print_theorems

typ "'a fset"
thm "Rep_fset"
thm "ABS_fset_def"

quotient_def 
  EMPTY :: "'a fset"
where
  "EMPTY \<equiv> ([]::'a list)"

term Nil
term EMPTY
thm EMPTY_def

quotient_def 
  INSERT :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a fset \<Rightarrow> 'a fset"
where
  "INSERT \<equiv> op #"

term Cons
term INSERT
thm INSERT_def

quotient_def 
  FUNION :: "'a fset \<Rightarrow> 'a fset \<Rightarrow> 'a fset"
where
  "FUNION \<equiv> (op @)"

term append
term FUNION
thm FUNION_def

thm Quotient_fset

thm QUOT_TYPE_I_fset.thm11


fun
  membship :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a list \<Rightarrow> bool" (infix "memb" 100)
where
  m1: "(x memb []) = False"
| m2: "(x memb (y#xs)) = ((x=y) \<or> (x memb xs))"

fun
  card1 :: "'a list \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
  card1_nil: "(card1 []) = 0"
| card1_cons: "(card1 (x # xs)) = (if (x memb xs) then (card1 xs) else (Suc (card1 xs)))"

quotient_def 
  CARD :: "'a fset \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
  "CARD \<equiv> card1"

term card1
term CARD
thm CARD_def

(* text {*
 Maybe make_const_def should require a theorem that says that the particular lifted function
 respects the relation. With it such a definition would be impossible:
 make_const_def @{binding CARD} @{term "length"} NoSyn @{typ "'a list"} @{typ "'a fset"} #> snd
*}*)

lemma card1_0:
  fixes a :: "'a list"
  shows "(card1 a = 0) = (a = [])"
  by (induct a) auto

lemma not_mem_card1:
  fixes x :: "'a"
  fixes xs :: "'a list"
  shows "(~(x memb xs)) = (card1 (x # xs) = Suc (card1 xs))"
  by auto

lemma mem_cons:
  fixes x :: "'a"
  fixes xs :: "'a list"
  assumes a : "x memb xs"
  shows "x # xs \<approx> xs"
  using a by (induct xs) (auto intro: list_eq.intros )

lemma card1_suc:
  fixes xs :: "'a list"
  fixes n :: "nat"
  assumes c: "card1 xs = Suc n"
  shows "\<exists>a ys. ~(a memb ys) \<and> xs \<approx> (a # ys)"
  using c
apply(induct xs)
apply (metis Suc_neq_Zero card1_0)
apply (metis QUOT_TYPE_I_fset.R_trans card1_cons list_eq_refl mem_cons)
done

definition
  rsp_fold
where
  "rsp_fold f = ((!u v. (f u v = f v u)) \<and> (!u v w. ((f u (f v w) = f (f u v) w))))"

primrec
  fold1
where
  "fold1 f (g :: 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b) (z :: 'b) [] = z"
| "fold1 f g z (a # A) =
     (if rsp_fold f
     then (
       if (a memb A) then (fold1 f g z A) else (f (g a) (fold1 f g z A))
     ) else z)"

lemma fs1_strong_cases:
  fixes X :: "'a list"
  shows "(X = []) \<or> (\<exists>a. \<exists> Y. (~(a memb Y) \<and> (X \<approx> a # Y)))"
  apply (induct X)
  apply (simp)
  apply (metis QUOT_TYPE_I_fset.thm11 list_eq_refl mem_cons m1)
  done

quotient_def
  IN :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a fset \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
  "IN \<equiv> membship"

term membship
term IN
thm IN_def

term fold1
quotient_def 
  FOLD :: "('a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> ('b \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b fset \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where
  "FOLD \<equiv> fold1"

term fold1
term fold
thm fold_def

quotient_def 
  fmap::"('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> 'a fset \<Rightarrow> 'b fset"
where
  "fmap \<equiv> map"

term map
term fmap
thm fmap_def

lemma memb_rsp:
  fixes z
  assumes a: "x \<approx> y"
  shows "(z memb x) = (z memb y)"
  using a by induct auto

lemma ho_memb_rsp[quotient_rsp]:
  "(op = ===> (op \<approx> ===> op =)) (op memb) (op memb)"
  by (simp add: memb_rsp)

lemma card1_rsp:
  fixes a b :: "'a list"
  assumes e: "a \<approx> b"
  shows "card1 a = card1 b"
  using e by induct (simp_all add:memb_rsp)

lemma ho_card1_rsp[quotient_rsp]: 
  "(op \<approx> ===> op =) card1 card1"
  by (simp add: card1_rsp)

lemma cons_rsp[quotient_rsp]:
  fixes z
  assumes a: "xs \<approx> ys"
  shows "(z # xs) \<approx> (z # ys)"
  using a by (rule list_eq.intros(5))

lemma ho_cons_rsp[quotient_rsp]:
  "(op = ===> op \<approx> ===> op \<approx>) op # op #"
  by (simp add: cons_rsp)

lemma append_rsp_fst:
  assumes a : "l1 \<approx> l2"
  shows "(l1 @ s) \<approx> (l2 @ s)"
  using a
  by (induct) (auto intro: list_eq.intros list_eq_refl)

lemma append_end:
  shows "(e # l) \<approx> (l @ [e])"
  apply (induct l)
  apply (auto intro: list_eq.intros list_eq_refl)
  done

lemma rev_rsp:
  shows "a \<approx> rev a"
  apply (induct a)
  apply simp
  apply (rule list_eq_refl)
  apply simp_all
  apply (rule list_eq.intros(6))
  prefer 2
  apply (rule append_rsp_fst)
  apply assumption
  apply (rule append_end)
  done

lemma append_sym_rsp:
  shows "(a @ b) \<approx> (b @ a)"
  apply (rule list_eq.intros(6))
  apply (rule append_rsp_fst)
  apply (rule rev_rsp)
  apply (rule list_eq.intros(6))
  apply (rule rev_rsp)
  apply (simp)
  apply (rule append_rsp_fst)
  apply (rule list_eq.intros(3))
  apply (rule rev_rsp)
  done

lemma append_rsp:
  assumes a : "l1 \<approx> r1"
  assumes b : "l2 \<approx> r2 "
  shows "(l1 @ l2) \<approx> (r1 @ r2)"
  apply (rule list_eq.intros(6))
  apply (rule append_rsp_fst)
  using a apply (assumption)
  apply (rule list_eq.intros(6))
  apply (rule append_sym_rsp)
  apply (rule list_eq.intros(6))
  apply (rule append_rsp_fst)
  using b apply (assumption)
  apply (rule append_sym_rsp)
  done

lemma ho_append_rsp[quotient_rsp]:
  "(op \<approx> ===> op \<approx> ===> op \<approx>) op @ op @"
  by (simp add: append_rsp)

lemma map_rsp:
  assumes a: "a \<approx> b"
  shows "map f a \<approx> map f b"
  using a
  apply (induct)
  apply(auto intro: list_eq.intros)
  done

lemma ho_map_rsp[quotient_rsp]:
  "(op = ===> op \<approx> ===> op \<approx>) map map"
  by (simp add: map_rsp)

lemma map_append:
  "(map f (a @ b)) \<approx> (map f a) @ (map f b)"
 by simp (rule list_eq_refl)

lemma ho_fold_rsp[quotient_rsp]:
  "(op = ===> op = ===> op = ===> op \<approx> ===> op =) fold1 fold1"
  apply (auto)
  apply (case_tac "rsp_fold x")
  prefer 2
  apply (erule_tac list_eq.induct)
  apply (simp_all)
  apply (erule_tac list_eq.induct)
  apply (simp_all)
  apply (auto simp add: memb_rsp rsp_fold_def)
done

print_quotients

ML {* val qty = @{typ "'a fset"} *}
ML {* val rsp_thms =
  @{thms ho_memb_rsp ho_cons_rsp ho_card1_rsp ho_map_rsp ho_append_rsp ho_fold_rsp} *}

ML {* val (rty, rel, rel_refl, rel_eqv) = lookup_quot_data @{context} qty *}
ML {* val (trans2, reps_same, absrep, quot) = lookup_quot_thms @{context} "fset"; *}
ML {* fun lift_tac_fset lthy t = lift_tac lthy t [rel_eqv] *}

lemma "IN x EMPTY = False"
apply(tactic {* procedure_tac @{context} @{thm m1} 1 *})
apply(tactic {* regularize_tac @{context} [rel_eqv] 1 *})
apply(tactic {* all_inj_repabs_tac @{context} [rel_refl] [trans2] 1 *})
apply(tactic {* clean_tac @{context} 1*})
done

lemma "IN x (INSERT y xa) = (x = y \<or> IN x xa)"
by (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm m2} 1 *})

lemma "INSERT a (INSERT a x) = INSERT a x"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm list_eq.intros(4)} 1 *})
done

lemma "x = xa \<Longrightarrow> INSERT a x = INSERT a xa"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm list_eq.intros(5)} 1 *})
done

lemma "CARD x = Suc n \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>a b. \<not> IN a b & x = INSERT a b)"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm card1_suc} 1 *})
done

lemma "(\<not> IN x xa) = (CARD (INSERT x xa) = Suc (CARD xa))"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm not_mem_card1} 1 *})
done

lemma "FOLD f g (z::'b) (INSERT a x) =
  (if rsp_fold f then if IN a x then FOLD f g z x else f (g a) (FOLD f g z x) else z)"
apply(tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm fold1.simps(2)} 1 *})
done

ML {* fun inj_repabs_tac_fset lthy = inj_repabs_tac lthy [rel_refl] [trans2] *}

lemma "fmap f (FUNION (x::'b fset) (xa::'b fset)) = FUNION (fmap f x) (fmap f xa)"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm map_append} 1 *})
done

lemma "FUNION (FUNION x xa) xb = FUNION x (FUNION xa xb)"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm append_assoc} 1 *})
done


lemma "\<lbrakk>P EMPTY; \<And>a x. P x \<Longrightarrow> P (INSERT a x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P l"
apply (tactic {* (ObjectLogic.full_atomize_tac THEN' gen_frees_tac @{context}) 1 *})
apply(tactic {* procedure_tac @{context} @{thm list.induct} 1 *})
apply(tactic {* regularize_tac @{context} [rel_eqv] 1 *})
prefer 2
apply(tactic {* clean_tac @{context} 1 *})
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 3 *) (* Ball-Ball *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 2 *) (* lam-lam-elim for R = (===>) *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 3 *) (* Ball-Ball *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 2 *) (* lam-lam-elim for R = (===>) *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* B *) (* Cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* B *) (* Cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 8 *) (* = reflexivity arising from cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* A *) (* application if type needs lifting *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* E *) (* R x y assumptions *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* D *) (* reflexivity of basic relations *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* B *) (* Cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* B *) (* Cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 8 *) (* = reflexivity arising from cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* B *) (* Cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 8 *) (* = reflexivity arising from cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* C *) (* = and extensionality *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 3 *) (* Ball-Ball *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 2 *) (* lam-lam-elim for R = (===>) *) 
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* B *) (* Cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* B *) (* Cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 8 *) (* = reflexivity arising from cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* A *) (* application if type needs lifting *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* E *) (* R x y assumptions *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* E *) (* R x y assumptions *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* A *) (* application if type needs lifting *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* E *) (* R x y assumptions *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* A *) (* application if type needs lifting *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* A *) (* application if type needs lifting *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 7 *) (* respectfulness *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 8 *) (* = reflexivity arising from cong *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* E *) (* R x y assumptions *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* A *) (* application if type needs lifting *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* E *) (* R x y assumptions *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* 9 *) (* Rep-Abs-elim - can be complex Rep-Abs *)
apply(tactic {* inj_repabs_tac_fset @{context} 1*}) (* E *) (* R x y assumptions *)
done

lemma list_induct_part:
  assumes a: "P (x :: 'a list) ([] :: 'c list)"
  assumes b: "\<And>e t. P x t \<Longrightarrow> P x (e # t)"
  shows "P x l"
  apply (rule_tac P="P x" in list.induct)
  apply (rule a)
  apply (rule b)
  apply (assumption)
  done

ML {* quot *}
thm quotient_thm

lemma "P (x :: 'a list) (EMPTY :: 'c fset) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>e t. P x t \<Longrightarrow> P x (INSERT e t)) \<Longrightarrow> P x l"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm list_induct_part} 1 *})
done

lemma "P (x :: 'a fset) (EMPTY :: 'c fset) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>e t. P x t \<Longrightarrow> P x (INSERT e t)) \<Longrightarrow> P x l"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm list_induct_part} 1 *})
done

lemma "P (x :: 'a fset) ([] :: 'c list) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>e t. P x t \<Longrightarrow> P x (e # t)) \<Longrightarrow> P x l"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm list_induct_part} 1 *})
done

quotient fset2 = "'a list" / "list_eq"
  apply(rule equivp_list_eq)
  done

quotient_def
  EMPTY2 :: "'a fset2"
where
  "EMPTY2 \<equiv> ([]::'a list)"

quotient_def
  INSERT2 :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a fset2 \<Rightarrow> 'a fset2"
where
  "INSERT2 \<equiv> op #"

ML {* val quot = @{thms Quotient_fset Quotient_fset2} *}
ML {* fun inj_repabs_tac_fset lthy = inj_repabs_tac lthy [rel_refl] [trans2] *}
ML {* fun lift_tac_fset lthy t = lift_tac lthy t [rel_eqv] *}

lemma "P (x :: 'a fset2) (EMPTY :: 'c fset) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>e t. P x t \<Longrightarrow> P x (INSERT e t)) \<Longrightarrow> P x l"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm list_induct_part} 1 *})
done

lemma "P (x :: 'a fset) (EMPTY2 :: 'c fset2) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>e t. P x t \<Longrightarrow> P x (INSERT2 e t)) \<Longrightarrow> P x l"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm list_induct_part} 1 *})
done

quotient_def
  fset_rec::"'a \<Rightarrow> ('b \<Rightarrow> 'b fset \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'b fset \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where
  "fset_rec \<equiv> list_rec"

quotient_def
  fset_case::"'a \<Rightarrow> ('b \<Rightarrow> 'b fset \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'b fset \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where
  "fset_case \<equiv> list_case"

(* Probably not true without additional assumptions about the function *)
lemma list_rec_rsp[quotient_rsp]:
  "(op = ===> (op = ===> op \<approx> ===> op =) ===> op \<approx> ===> op =) list_rec list_rec"
  apply (auto)
  apply (erule_tac list_eq.induct)
  apply (simp_all)
  sorry

lemma list_case_rsp[quotient_rsp]:
  "(op = ===> (op = ===> op \<approx> ===> op =) ===> op \<approx> ===> op =) list_case list_case"
  apply (auto)
  sorry

ML {* val rsp_thms = @{thms list_rec_rsp list_case_rsp} @ rsp_thms *}
ML {* fun lift_tac_fset lthy t = lift_tac lthy t [rel_eqv] *}

lemma "fset_rec (f1::'t) x (INSERT a xa) = x a xa (fset_rec f1 x xa)"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm list.recs(2)} 1 *})
done

lemma "fset_case (f1::'t) f2 (INSERT a xa) = f2 a xa"
apply (tactic {* lift_tac_fset @{context} @{thm list.cases(2)} 1 *})
done


end