the chk-functions in quotient_term also simplify the result according to the id_simps; had to remove id_def from this theorem list though; this caused in FSet3 that relied on this rule; the problem is marked with "ID PROBLEM"
(* Title: ??/QuotMain.thy
Author: Cezary Kaliszyk and Christian Urban
*)
theory QuotMain
imports QuotScript Prove
uses ("quotient_info.ML")
("quotient_typ.ML")
("quotient_def.ML")
("quotient_term.ML")
("quotient_tacs.ML")
begin
locale Quot_Type =
fixes R :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
and Abs :: "('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> 'b"
and Rep :: "'b \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> bool)"
assumes equivp: "equivp R"
and rep_prop: "\<And>y. \<exists>x. Rep y = R x"
and rep_inverse: "\<And>x. Abs (Rep x) = x"
and abs_inverse: "\<And>x. (Rep (Abs (R x))) = (R x)"
and rep_inject: "\<And>x y. (Rep x = Rep y) = (x = y)"
begin
definition
abs::"'a \<Rightarrow> 'b"
where
"abs x \<equiv> Abs (R x)"
definition
rep::"'b \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where
"rep a = Eps (Rep a)"
lemma lem9:
shows "R (Eps (R x)) = R x"
proof -
have a: "R x x" using equivp by (simp add: equivp_reflp_symp_transp reflp_def)
then have "R x (Eps (R x))" by (rule someI)
then show "R (Eps (R x)) = R x"
using equivp unfolding equivp_def by simp
qed
theorem thm10:
shows "abs (rep a) \<equiv> a"
apply (rule eq_reflection)
unfolding abs_def rep_def
proof -
from rep_prop
obtain x where eq: "Rep a = R x" by auto
have "Abs (R (Eps (Rep a))) = Abs (R (Eps (R x)))" using eq by simp
also have "\<dots> = Abs (R x)" using lem9 by simp
also have "\<dots> = Abs (Rep a)" using eq by simp
also have "\<dots> = a" using rep_inverse by simp
finally
show "Abs (R (Eps (Rep a))) = a" by simp
qed
lemma rep_refl:
shows "R (rep a) (rep a)"
unfolding rep_def
by (simp add: equivp[simplified equivp_def])
lemma lem7:
shows "(R x = R y) = (Abs (R x) = Abs (R y))"
apply(rule iffI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule rep_inject[THEN iffD2])
apply(simp add: abs_inverse)
done
theorem thm11:
shows "R r r' = (abs r = abs r')"
unfolding abs_def
by (simp only: equivp[simplified equivp_def] lem7)
lemma rep_abs_rsp:
shows "R f (rep (abs g)) = R f g"
and "R (rep (abs g)) f = R g f"
by (simp_all add: thm10 thm11)
lemma Quotient:
shows "Quotient R abs rep"
apply(unfold Quotient_def)
apply(simp add: thm10)
apply(simp add: rep_refl)
apply(subst thm11[symmetric])
apply(simp add: equivp[simplified equivp_def])
done
end
term Quot_Type.abs
section {* ML setup *}
(* Auxiliary data for the quotient package *)
use "quotient_info.ML"
declare [[map "fun" = (fun_map, fun_rel)]]
lemmas [quot_thm] = fun_quotient
lemmas [quot_respect] = quot_rel_rsp
lemmas [quot_equiv] = identity_equivp
(* Lemmas about simplifying id's. *)
lemmas [id_simps] =
fun_map_id[THEN eq_reflection]
id_apply[THEN eq_reflection]
(*id_def[THEN eq_reflection, symmetric]*)
id_o[THEN eq_reflection]
o_id[THEN eq_reflection]
eq_comp_r
(* The translation functions for the lifting process. *)
use "quotient_term.ML"
(* Definition of the quotient types *)
use "quotient_typ.ML"
(* Definitions for quotient constants *)
use "quotient_def.ML"
(* Tactics for proving the lifted theorems *)
lemma eq_imp_rel:
"equivp R \<Longrightarrow> a = b \<longrightarrow> R a b"
by (simp add: equivp_reflp)
(* An auxiliar constant for recording some information *)
(* about the lifted theorem in a tactic. *)
definition
"Quot_True x \<equiv> True"
lemma
shows QT_all: "Quot_True (All P) \<Longrightarrow> Quot_True P"
and QT_ex: "Quot_True (Ex P) \<Longrightarrow> Quot_True P"
and QT_lam: "Quot_True (\<lambda>x. P x) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. Quot_True (P x))"
and QT_ext: "(\<And>x. Quot_True (a x) \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x) \<Longrightarrow> (Quot_True a \<Longrightarrow> f = g)"
by (simp_all add: Quot_True_def ext)
lemma QT_imp: "Quot_True a \<equiv> Quot_True b"
by (simp add: Quot_True_def)
use "quotient_tacs.ML"
(* Atomize infrastructure *)
(* FIXME/TODO: is this really needed? *)
(*
lemma atomize_eqv[atomize]:
shows "(Trueprop A \<equiv> Trueprop B) \<equiv> (A \<equiv> B)"
proof
assume "A \<equiv> B"
then show "Trueprop A \<equiv> Trueprop B" by unfold
next
assume *: "Trueprop A \<equiv> Trueprop B"
have "A = B"
proof (cases A)
case True
have "A" by fact
then show "A = B" using * by simp
next
case False
have "\<not>A" by fact
then show "A = B" using * by auto
qed
then show "A \<equiv> B" by (rule eq_reflection)
qed
*)
section {* Methods / Interface *}
ML {*
fun mk_method1 tac thm ctxt =
SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (tac ctxt thm))
fun mk_method2 tac ctxt =
SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (tac ctxt))
*}
method_setup lifting =
{* Attrib.thm >> (mk_method1 Quotient_Tacs.lift_tac) *}
{* Lifting of theorems to quotient types. *}
method_setup lifting_setup =
{* Attrib.thm >> (mk_method1 Quotient_Tacs.procedure_tac) *}
{* Sets up the three goals for the lifting procedure. *}
method_setup regularize =
{* Scan.succeed (mk_method2 Quotient_Tacs.regularize_tac) *}
{* Proves automatically the regularization goals from the lifting procedure. *}
method_setup injection =
{* Scan.succeed (mk_method2 Quotient_Tacs.all_injection_tac) *}
{* Proves automatically the rep/abs injection goals from the lifting procedure. *}
method_setup cleaning =
{* Scan.succeed (mk_method2 Quotient_Tacs.clean_tac) *}
{* Proves automatically the cleaning goals from the lifting procedure. *}
end