Paper/Paper.thy
changeset 1732 6eaae2651292
parent 1730 cfd3a7368543
parent 1729 2293711213dd
child 1733 6988077666dc
equal deleted inserted replaced
1731:3832a31a73b1 1732:6eaae2651292
  1487 
  1487 
  1488   Unfolding the definition of supports on both sides of the equations we
  1488   Unfolding the definition of supports on both sides of the equations we
  1489   obtain by simple calculations the equalities.
  1489   obtain by simple calculations the equalities.
  1490   \end{proof}
  1490   \end{proof}
  1491 
  1491 
  1492   With the above equations we can substitute free variables for support in
  1492 %%% Without defining permute_bn, we cannot even write the substitution
  1493   the lifted free variable equations, which gives us the support equations
  1493 %%% of bindings in term constructors...
  1494   for the term constructors. With this we can show that for each binding in
  1494 
  1495   a constructors the bindings can be renamed. 
  1495 % With the above equations we can substitute free variables for support in
       
  1496 % the lifted free variable equations, which gives us the support equations
       
  1497 % for the term constructors. With this we can show that for each binding in
       
  1498 % a constructors the bindings can be renamed.
  1496 
  1499 
  1497 *}
  1500 *}
  1498 
  1501 
  1499 text {*
  1502 text {*
  1500 %%% FIXME: The restricions should have already been described in previous sections?
  1503 %%% FIXME: The restricions should have already been described in previous sections?