(*notation ( output) "prop" ("#_" [1000] 1000) *)

notation ( output) "Trueprop" ("#_" [1000] 1000)

lemma regularize_to_injection:

  shows "(QUOT_TRUE l \<Longrightarrow> y) \<Longrightarrow> (l = r) \<longrightarrow> y"

  by(auto simp add: QUOT_TRUE_def)

(* Atomize infrastructure *)

(* FIXME/TODO: is this really needed? *)

(*

lemma atomize_eqv:

  shows "(Trueprop A \<equiv> Trueprop B) \<equiv> (A \<equiv> B)"

proof

  assume "A \<equiv> B"

  then show "Trueprop A \<equiv> Trueprop B" by unfold

next

  assume *: "Trueprop A \<equiv> Trueprop B"

  have "A = B"

  proof (cases A)

    case True

    have "A" by fact

    then show "A = B" using * by simp

  next

    case False

    have "\<not>A" by fact

    then show "A = B" using * by auto

  qed

  then show "A \<equiv> B" by (rule eq_reflection)

qed

*)

ML {*

  fun dest_cbinop t =

    let

      val (t2, rhs) = Thm.dest_comb t;

      val (bop, lhs) = Thm.dest_comb t2;

    in

      (bop, (lhs, rhs))

    end

*}

ML {*

  fun dest_ceq t =

    let

      val (bop, pair) = dest_cbinop t;

      val (bop_s, _) = Term.dest_Const (Thm.term_of bop);

    in

      if bop_s = "op =" then pair else (raise CTERM ("Not an equality", [t]))

    end

*}

ML {*

  fun split_binop_conv t =

    let

      val (lhs, rhs) = dest_ceq t;

      val (bop, _) = dest_cbinop lhs;

      val [clT, cr2] = bop |> Thm.ctyp_of_term |> Thm.dest_ctyp;

      val [cmT, crT] = Thm.dest_ctyp cr2;

    in

      Drule.instantiate' [SOME clT, SOME cmT, SOME crT] [NONE, NONE, NONE, NONE, SOME bop] @{thm arg_cong2}

    end

*}

ML {*

  fun split_arg_conv t =

    let

      val (lhs, rhs) = dest_ceq t;

      val (lop, larg) = Thm.dest_comb lhs;

      val [caT, crT] = lop |> Thm.ctyp_of_term |> Thm.dest_ctyp;

    in

      Drule.instantiate' [SOME caT, SOME crT] [NONE, NONE, SOME lop] @{thm arg_cong}

    end

*}

ML {*

  fun split_binop_tac n thm =

    let

      val concl = Thm.cprem_of thm n;

      val (_, cconcl) = Thm.dest_comb concl;

      val rewr = split_binop_conv cconcl;

    in

      rtac rewr n thm

    end

      handle CTERM _ => Seq.empty

*}

ML {*

  fun split_arg_tac n thm =

    let

      val concl = Thm.cprem_of thm n;

      val (_, cconcl) = Thm.dest_comb concl;

      val rewr = split_arg_conv cconcl;

    in

      rtac rewr n thm

    end

      handle CTERM _ => Seq.empty

*}

lemma trueprop_cong:

  shows "(a \<equiv> b) \<Longrightarrow> (Trueprop a \<equiv> Trueprop b)"

  by auto

lemma list_induct_hol4:

  fixes P :: "'a list \<Rightarrow> bool"

  assumes a: "((P []) \<and> (\<forall>t. (P t) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>h. (P (h # t)))))"

  shows "\<forall>l. (P l)"

  using a

  apply (rule_tac allI)

  apply (induct_tac "l")

  apply (simp)

  apply (metis)

  done

ML {*

val no_vars = Thm.rule_attribute (fn context => fn th =>

  let

    val ctxt = Variable.set_body false (Context.proof_of context);

    val ((_, [th']), _) = Variable.import true [th] ctxt;

  in th' end);

*}

(*lemma equality_twice:

  "a = c \<Longrightarrow> b = d \<Longrightarrow> (a = b \<longrightarrow> c = d)"

by auto*)

(*interpretation code *)

(*val bindd = ((Binding.make ("", Position.none)), ([]: Attrib.src list))

  val ((_, [eqn1pre]), lthy5) = Variable.import true [ABS_def] lthy4;

  val eqn1i = Thm.prop_of (symmetric eqn1pre)

  val ((_, [eqn2pre]), lthy6) = Variable.import true [REP_def] lthy5;

  val eqn2i = Thm.prop_of (symmetric eqn2pre)

  val exp_morphism = ProofContext.export_morphism lthy6 (ProofContext.init (ProofContext.theory_of lthy6));

  val exp_term = Morphism.term exp_morphism;

  val exp = Morphism.thm exp_morphism;

  val mthd = Method.SIMPLE_METHOD ((rtac quot_thm 1) THEN

    ALLGOALS (simp_tac (HOL_basic_ss addsimps [(symmetric (exp ABS_def)), (symmetric (exp REP_def))])))

  val mthdt = Method.Basic (fn _ => mthd)

  val bymt = Proof.global_terminal_proof (mthdt, NONE)

  val exp_i = [(@{const_name QUOT_TYPE}, ((("QUOT_TYPE_I_" ^ (Binding.name_of qty_name)), true),

    Expression.Named [("R", rel), ("Abs", abs), ("Rep", rep) ]))]*)

(*||> Local_Theory.theory (fn thy =>

      let

        val global_eqns = map exp_term [eqn2i, eqn1i];

        (* Not sure if the following context should not be used *)

        val (global_eqns2, lthy7) = Variable.import_terms true global_eqns lthy6;

        val global_eqns3 = map (fn t => (bindd, t)) global_eqns2;

      in ProofContext.theory_of (bymt (Expression.interpretation (exp_i, []) global_eqns3 thy)) end)*)