theory Term1

imports "Nominal2_Atoms" "Nominal2_Eqvt" "Nominal2_Supp" "Abs" "Perm" "Fv" "Rsp" "../Attic/Prove"

begin

atom_decl name

section {*** lets with binding patterns ***}

datatype rtrm1 =

  rVr1 "name"

| rAp1 "rtrm1" "rtrm1"

| rLm1 "name" "rtrm1"        --"name is bound in trm1"

| rLt1 "bp" "rtrm1" "rtrm1"   --"all variables in bp are bound in the 2nd trm1"

and bp =

  BUnit

| BVr "name"

| BPr "bp" "bp"

print_theorems

(* to be given by the user *)

primrec 

  bv1

where

  "bv1 (BUnit) = {}"

| "bv1 (BVr x) = {atom x}"

| "bv1 (BPr bp1 bp2) = (bv1 bp1) \<union> (bv1 bp2)"

setup {* snd o define_raw_perms (Datatype.the_info @{theory} "Term1.rtrm1") 2 *}

thm permute_rtrm1_permute_bp.simps

local_setup {*

  snd o define_fv_alpha (Datatype.the_info @{theory} "Term1.rtrm1")

notation

  alpha_rtrm1 ("_ \<approx>1 _" [100, 100] 100) and

  alpha_bp ("_ \<approx>1b _" [100, 100] 100)

thm alpha_rtrm1_alpha_bp.intros

thm fv_rtrm1_fv_bp.simps[no_vars]

local_setup {* (fn ctxt => snd (Local_Theory.note ((@{binding alpha1_inj}, []), (build_alpha_inj @{thms alpha_rtrm1_alpha_bp.intros} @{thms rtrm1.distinct rtrm1.inject bp.distinct bp.inject} @{thms alpha_rtrm1.cases alpha_bp.cases} ctxt)) ctxt)) *}

thm alpha1_inj

local_setup {*

snd o (build_eqvts @{binding bv1_eqvt} [@{term bv1}] [@{term "permute :: perm \<Rightarrow> bp \<Rightarrow> bp"}] (@{thms bv1.simps permute_rtrm1_permute_bp.simps}) @{thm rtrm1_bp.inducts(2)})

*}

local_setup {*

snd o build_eqvts @{binding fv_rtrm1_fv_bp_eqvt} [@{term fv_rtrm1}, @{term fv_bp}] [@{term "permute :: perm \<Rightarrow> rtrm1 \<Rightarrow> rtrm1"},@{term "permute :: perm \<Rightarrow> bp \<Rightarrow> bp"}] (@{thms fv_rtrm1_fv_bp.simps permute_rtrm1_permute_bp.simps}) @{thm rtrm1_bp.induct}

*}

*}

lemma alpha1_eqvt_proper[eqvt]:

  "pi \<bullet> (t \<approx>1 s) = ((pi \<bullet> t) \<approx>1 (pi \<bullet> s))"

  "pi \<bullet> (alpha_bp a b) = (alpha_bp (pi \<bullet> a) (pi \<bullet> b))"

  apply (simp_all only: eqvts)

  apply rule

  apply (simp_all add: alpha1_eqvt)

  apply (subst permute_minus_cancel(2)[symmetric,of "t" "pi"])

  apply (subst permute_minus_cancel(2)[symmetric,of "s" "pi"])

  apply (simp_all only: alpha1_eqvt)

  apply rule

  apply (simp_all add: alpha1_eqvt)

  apply (subst permute_minus_cancel(2)[symmetric,of "a" "pi"])

  apply (subst permute_minus_cancel(2)[symmetric,of "b" "pi"])

  apply (simp_all only: alpha1_eqvt)

done

thm eqvts_raw(1)

local_setup {* (fn ctxt => snd (Local_Theory.note ((@{binding alpha1_equivp}, []),

  (build_equivps [@{term alpha_rtrm1}, @{term alpha_bp}] @{thm rtrm1_bp.induct} @{thm alpha_rtrm1_alpha_bp.induct} @{thms rtrm1.inject bp.inject} @{thms alpha1_inj} @{thms rtrm1.distinct bp.distinct} @{thms alpha_rtrm1.cases alpha_bp.cases} @{thms alpha1_eqvt} ctxt)) ctxt)) *}

thm alpha1_equivp

local_setup  {* define_quotient_type [(([], @{binding trm1}, NoSyn), (@{typ rtrm1}, @{term alpha_rtrm1}))]

  (rtac @{thm alpha1_equivp(1)} 1) *}

local_setup {*

(fn ctxt => ctxt

 |> snd o (Quotient_Def.quotient_lift_const ("Vr1", @{term rVr1}))

 |> snd o (Quotient_Def.quotient_lift_const ("Ap1", @{term rAp1}))

 |> snd o (Quotient_Def.quotient_lift_const ("Lm1", @{term rLm1}))

 |> snd o (Quotient_Def.quotient_lift_const ("Lt1", @{term rLt1}))

 |> snd o (Quotient_Def.quotient_lift_const ("fv_trm1", @{term fv_rtrm1})))

*}

print_theorems

local_setup {* snd o prove_const_rsp @{binding fv_rtrm1_rsp} [@{term fv_rtrm1}]

  (fn _ => fvbv_rsp_tac @{thm alpha_rtrm1_alpha_bp.inducts(1)} @{thms fv_rtrm1_fv_bp.simps} 1) *}

local_setup {* snd o prove_const_rsp @{binding rVr1_rsp} [@{term rVr1}]

  (fn _ => constr_rsp_tac @{thms alpha1_inj} @{thms fv_rtrm1_rsp} @{thms alpha1_equivp} 1) *}

local_setup {* snd o prove_const_rsp @{binding rAp1_rsp} [@{term rAp1}]

  (fn _ => constr_rsp_tac @{thms alpha1_inj} @{thms fv_rtrm1_rsp} @{thms alpha1_equivp} 1) *}

local_setup {* snd o prove_const_rsp @{binding rLm1_rsp} [@{term rLm1}]

  (fn _ => constr_rsp_tac @{thms alpha1_inj} @{thms fv_rtrm1_rsp} @{thms alpha1_equivp} 1) *}

local_setup {* snd o prove_const_rsp @{binding rLt1_rsp} [@{term rLt1}]

  (fn _ => constr_rsp_tac @{thms alpha1_inj} @{thms fv_rtrm1_rsp} @{thms alpha1_equivp} 1) *}

local_setup {* snd o prove_const_rsp @{binding permute_rtrm1_rsp} [@{term "permute :: perm \<Rightarrow> rtrm1 \<Rightarrow> rtrm1"}]

  (fn _ => asm_simp_tac (HOL_ss addsimps @{thms alpha1_eqvt}) 1) *}

lemmas trm1_bp_induct = rtrm1_bp.induct[quot_lifted]

lemmas trm1_bp_inducts = rtrm1_bp.inducts[quot_lifted]

setup {* define_lifted_perms ["Term1.trm1"] [("permute_trm1", @{term "permute :: perm \<Rightarrow> rtrm1 \<Rightarrow> rtrm1"})]

  @{thms permute_rtrm1_permute_bp_zero permute_rtrm1_permute_bp_append} *}

lemmas

    permute_trm1 = permute_rtrm1_permute_bp.simps[quot_lifted]

and fv_trm1 = fv_rtrm1_fv_bp.simps[quot_lifted]

and fv_trm1_eqvt = fv_rtrm1_fv_bp_eqvt(1)[quot_lifted]

and alpha1_INJ = alpha1_inj[unfolded alpha_gen, quot_lifted, folded alpha_gen]

lemma supports:

  "(supp (atom x)) supports (Vr1 x)"

  "(supp t \<union> supp s) supports (Ap1 t s)"

  "(supp (atom x) \<union> supp t) supports (Lm1 x t)"

  "(supp b \<union> supp t \<union> supp s) supports (Lt1 b t s)"

  "{} supports BUnit"

  "(supp (atom x)) supports (BVr x)"

  "(supp a \<union> supp b) supports (BPr a b)"

apply(simp_all add: supports_def fresh_def[symmetric] swap_fresh_fresh permute_trm1)

apply(rule_tac [!] allI)+

apply(rule_tac [!] impI)

apply(tactic {* ALLGOALS (REPEAT o etac conjE) *})

apply(simp_all add: fresh_atom)

done

lemma rtrm1_bp_fs:

  "finite (supp (x :: trm1))"

  "finite (supp (b :: bp))"

  apply (induct x and b rule: trm1_bp_inducts)

  apply(tactic {* ALLGOALS (rtac @{thm supports_finite} THEN' resolve_tac @{thms supports}) *})

  apply(simp_all add: supp_atom)

  done

instance trm1 :: fs

apply default

apply (rule rtrm1_bp_fs(1))

done

lemma fv_eq_bv: "fv_bp bp = bv1 bp"

apply(induct bp rule: trm1_bp_inducts(2))

apply(simp_all)

done

lemma helper2: "{b. \<forall>pi. pi \<bullet> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> bp \<noteq> bp} = {}"

apply auto

apply (rule_tac x="(x \<rightleftharpoons> a)" in exI)

apply auto

done

lemma alpha_bp_eq_eq: "alpha_bp a b = (a = b)"

apply rule

apply (induct a b rule: alpha_rtrm1_alpha_bp.inducts(2))

apply (simp_all add: equivp_reflp[OF alpha1_equivp(2)])

done

lemma alpha_bp_eq: "alpha_bp = (op =)"

apply (rule ext)+

apply (rule alpha_bp_eq_eq)

done

lemma supp_fv:

  "supp t = fv_trm1 t"

  "supp b = fv_bp b"

apply(induct t and b rule: trm1_bp_inducts)

apply(simp_all)

apply(simp add: supp_def permute_trm1 alpha1_INJ fv_trm1)

apply(simp only: supp_at_base[simplified supp_def])

apply(simp add: supp_def permute_trm1 alpha1_INJ fv_trm1)

apply(simp add: Collect_imp_eq Collect_neg_eq)

apply(subgoal_tac "supp (Lm1 name rtrm1) = supp (Abs {atom name} rtrm1)")

apply(simp add: supp_Abs fv_trm1)

apply(simp (no_asm) add: supp_def permute_set_eq atom_eqvt permute_trm1)

apply(simp add: alpha1_INJ)

apply(simp add: Abs_eq_iff)

apply(simp add: alpha_gen.simps)

apply(simp add: supp_eqvt[symmetric] fv_trm1_eqvt[symmetric])

apply(subgoal_tac "supp (Lt1 bp rtrm11 rtrm12) = supp(rtrm11) \<union> supp (Abs (bv1 bp) rtrm12)")

apply(simp add: supp_Abs fv_trm1 fv_eq_bv)

apply(simp (no_asm) add: supp_def permute_trm1)

apply(simp add: alpha1_INJ alpha_bp_eq)

apply(simp add: Abs_eq_iff)

apply(simp add: alpha_gen)

apply(simp add: supp_eqvt[symmetric] fv_trm1_eqvt[symmetric] bv1_eqvt fv_eq_bv)

apply(simp add: Collect_imp_eq Collect_neg_eq fresh_star_def helper2)

apply(simp (no_asm) add: supp_def permute_set_eq atom_eqvt)

apply(simp (no_asm) add: supp_def eqvts)

apply(fold supp_def)

apply(simp add: supp_at_base)

apply(simp (no_asm) add: supp_def Collect_imp_eq Collect_neg_eq)

apply(simp add: Collect_imp_eq[symmetric] Collect_neg_eq[symmetric] supp_def[symmetric])

done

lemma trm1_supp:

  "supp (Vr1 x) = {atom x}"

  "supp (Ap1 t1 t2) = supp t1 \<union> supp t2"

  "supp (Lm1 x t) = (supp t) - {atom x}"

  "supp (Lt1 b t s) = supp t \<union> (supp s - bv1 b)"

by (simp_all add: supp_fv fv_trm1 fv_eq_bv)

lemma trm1_induct_strong:

  assumes "\<And>name b. P b (Vr1 name)"

  and     "\<And>rtrm11 rtrm12 b. \<lbrakk>\<And>c. P c rtrm11; \<And>c. P c rtrm12\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P b (Ap1 rtrm11 rtrm12)"

  and     "\<And>name rtrm1 b. \<lbrakk>\<And>c. P c rtrm1; (atom name) \<sharp> b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P b (Lm1 name rtrm1)"

  and     "\<And>bp rtrm11 rtrm12 b. \<lbrakk>\<And>c. P c rtrm11; \<And>c. P c rtrm12; bv1 bp \<sharp>* b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P b (Lt1 bp rtrm11 rtrm12)"

  shows   "P a rtrma"

sorry

end