2436
+ − 1
theory Let
2454
+ − 2
imports "../Nominal2"
1600
+ − 3
begin
+ − 4
+ − 5
atom_decl name
+ − 6
+ − 7
nominal_datatype trm =
2436
+ − 8
Var "name"
+ − 9
| App "trm" "trm"
2950
0911cb7bf696
changed bind to binds in specifications; bind will cause trouble with Monad_Syntax
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 10
| Lam x::"name" t::"trm" binds x in t
0911cb7bf696
changed bind to binds in specifications; bind will cause trouble with Monad_Syntax
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 11
| Let as::"assn" t::"trm" binds "bn as" in t
2490
+ − 12
and assn =
+ − 13
ANil
+ − 14
| ACons "name" "trm" "assn"
1600
+ − 15
binder
+ − 16
bn
+ − 17
where
2490
+ − 18
"bn ANil = []"
+ − 19
| "bn (ACons x t as) = (atom x) # (bn as)"
+ − 20
2924
+ − 21
print_theorems
+ − 22
+ − 23
thm alpha_trm_raw_alpha_assn_raw_alpha_bn_raw.intros
+ − 24
thm bn_raw.simps
+ − 25
thm permute_bn_raw.simps
+ − 26
thm trm_assn.perm_bn_alpha
+ − 27
thm trm_assn.permute_bn
+ − 28
2490
+ − 29
thm trm_assn.fv_defs
2924
+ − 30
thm trm_assn.eq_iff
2490
+ − 31
thm trm_assn.bn_defs
2922
+ − 32
thm trm_assn.bn_inducts
2490
+ − 33
thm trm_assn.perm_simps
2956
+ − 34
thm trm_assn.permute_bn
2492
5ac9a74d22fd
post-processed eq_iff and supp threormes according to the fv-supp equality
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 35
thm trm_assn.induct
5ac9a74d22fd
post-processed eq_iff and supp threormes according to the fv-supp equality
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 36
thm trm_assn.inducts
2490
+ − 37
thm trm_assn.distinct
+ − 38
thm trm_assn.supp
2493
+ − 39
thm trm_assn.fresh
2617
e44551d067e6
properly exported strong exhaust theorem; cleaned up some examples
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 40
thm trm_assn.exhaust
e44551d067e6
properly exported strong exhaust theorem; cleaned up some examples
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 41
thm trm_assn.strong_exhaust
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 42
thm trm_assn.perm_bn_simps
2494
+ − 43
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 44
lemma alpha_bn_inducts_raw[consumes 1]:
2923
+ − 45
"\<lbrakk>alpha_bn_raw a b; P3 ANil_raw ANil_raw;
+ − 46
\<And>trm_raw trm_rawa assn_raw assn_rawa name namea.
+ − 47
\<lbrakk>alpha_trm_raw trm_raw trm_rawa; alpha_bn_raw assn_raw assn_rawa;
+ − 48
P3 assn_raw assn_rawa\<rbrakk>
+ − 49
\<Longrightarrow> P3 (ACons_raw name trm_raw assn_raw)
+ − 50
(ACons_raw namea trm_rawa assn_rawa)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P3 a b"
+ − 51
by (erule alpha_trm_raw_alpha_assn_raw_alpha_bn_raw.inducts(3)[of _ _ "\<lambda>x y. True" _ "\<lambda>x y. True", simplified]) auto
+ − 52
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 53
lemmas alpha_bn_inducts[consumes 1] = alpha_bn_inducts_raw[quot_lifted]
2923
+ − 54
+ − 55
+ − 56
+ − 57
lemma alpha_bn_refl: "alpha_bn x x"
+ − 58
by (induct x rule: trm_assn.inducts(2))
+ − 59
(rule TrueI, auto simp add: trm_assn.eq_iff)
+ − 60
lemma alpha_bn_sym: "alpha_bn x y \<Longrightarrow> alpha_bn y x"
+ − 61
sorry
+ − 62
lemma alpha_bn_trans: "alpha_bn x y \<Longrightarrow> alpha_bn y z \<Longrightarrow> alpha_bn x z"
+ − 63
sorry
2922
+ − 64
2923
+ − 65
lemma bn_inj[rule_format]:
+ − 66
assumes a: "alpha_bn x y"
+ − 67
shows "bn x = bn y \<longrightarrow> x = y"
+ − 68
by (rule alpha_bn_inducts[OF a]) (simp_all add: trm_assn.bn_defs)
+ − 69
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 70
lemma bn_inj2:
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 71
assumes a: "alpha_bn x y"
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 72
shows "\<And>q r. (q \<bullet> bn x) = (r \<bullet> bn y) \<Longrightarrow> permute_bn q x = permute_bn r y"
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 73
using a
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 74
apply(induct rule: alpha_bn_inducts)
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 75
apply(simp add: trm_assn.perm_bn_simps)
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 76
apply(simp add: trm_assn.perm_bn_simps)
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 77
apply(simp add: trm_assn.bn_defs)
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 78
done
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 79
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 80
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 81
function
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 82
apply_assn :: "(trm \<Rightarrow> nat) \<Rightarrow> assn \<Rightarrow> nat"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 83
where
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 84
"apply_assn f ANil = (0 :: nat)"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 85
| "apply_assn f (ACons x t as) = max (f t) (apply_assn f as)"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 86
apply(case_tac x)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 87
apply(case_tac b rule: trm_assn.exhaust(2))
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 88
apply(simp_all)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 89
apply(blast)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 90
done
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 91
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 92
termination by lexicographic_order
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 93
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 94
lemma [eqvt]:
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 95
"p \<bullet> (apply_assn f a) = apply_assn (p \<bullet> f) (p \<bullet> a)"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 96
apply(induct f a rule: apply_assn.induct)
3183
313e6f2cdd89
added permutation simplification to the simplifier; this makes the simplifier more powerful, but it potentially loops more often
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 97
apply simp
313e6f2cdd89
added permutation simplification to the simplifier; this makes the simplifier more powerful, but it potentially loops more often
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 98
apply(simp only: apply_assn.simps trm_assn.perm_simps)
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 99
apply(perm_simp)
3183
313e6f2cdd89
added permutation simplification to the simplifier; this makes the simplifier more powerful, but it potentially loops more often
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 100
apply(simp)
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 101
done
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 102
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 103
lemma alpha_bn_apply_assn:
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 104
assumes "alpha_bn as bs"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 105
shows "apply_assn f as = apply_assn f bs"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 106
using assms
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 107
apply (induct rule: alpha_bn_inducts)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 108
apply simp_all
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 109
done
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 110
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 111
nominal_primrec
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 112
height_trm :: "trm \<Rightarrow> nat"
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 113
where
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 114
"height_trm (Var x) = 1"
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 115
| "height_trm (App l r) = max (height_trm l) (height_trm r)"
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 116
| "height_trm (Lam v b) = 1 + (height_trm b)"
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 117
| "height_trm (Let as b) = max (apply_assn height_trm as) (height_trm b)"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 118
apply (simp only: eqvt_def height_trm_graph_def)
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 119
apply (rule, perm_simp, rule, rule TrueI)
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 120
apply (case_tac x rule: trm_assn.exhaust(1))
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 121
apply (auto)[4]
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 122
apply (drule_tac x="assn" in meta_spec)
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 123
apply (drule_tac x="trm" in meta_spec)
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 124
apply (simp add: alpha_bn_refl)
3192
+ − 125
using [[simproc del: alpha_lst]]
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 126
apply(simp_all)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 127
apply (erule_tac c="()" in Abs_lst1_fcb2)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 128
apply (simp_all add: pure_fresh fresh_star_def eqvt_at_def)[4]
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 129
apply (erule conjE)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 130
apply (subst alpha_bn_apply_assn)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 131
apply assumption
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 132
apply (rule arg_cong) back
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 133
apply (erule_tac c="()" in Abs_lst_fcb2)
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 134
apply (simp_all add: pure_fresh fresh_star_def)[3]
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 135
apply (simp_all add: eqvt_at_def)[2]
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 136
done
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 137
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 138
definition "height_assn = apply_assn height_trm"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 139
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 140
function
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 141
apply_assn2 :: "(trm \<Rightarrow> trm) \<Rightarrow> assn \<Rightarrow> assn"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 142
where
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 143
"apply_assn2 f ANil = ANil"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 144
| "apply_assn2 f (ACons x t as) = ACons x (f t) (apply_assn2 f as)"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 145
apply(case_tac x)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 146
apply(case_tac b rule: trm_assn.exhaust(2))
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 147
apply(simp_all)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 148
apply(blast)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 149
done
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 150
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 151
termination by lexicographic_order
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 152
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 153
lemma [eqvt]:
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 154
"p \<bullet> (apply_assn2 f a) = apply_assn2 (p \<bullet> f) (p \<bullet> a)"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 155
apply(induct f a rule: apply_assn2.induct)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 156
apply simp_all
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 157
done
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 158
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 159
lemma bn_apply_assn2: "bn (apply_assn2 f as) = bn as"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 160
apply (induct as rule: trm_assn.inducts(2))
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 161
apply (rule TrueI)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 162
apply (simp_all add: trm_assn.bn_defs)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 163
done
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 164
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 165
nominal_primrec
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 166
subst :: "name \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> trm"
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 167
where
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 168
"subst s t (Var x) = (if (s = x) then t else (Var x))"
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 169
| "subst s t (App l r) = App (subst s t l) (subst s t r)"
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 170
| "atom v \<sharp> (s, t) \<Longrightarrow> subst s t (Lam v b) = Lam v (subst s t b)"
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 171
| "set (bn as) \<sharp>* (s, t) \<Longrightarrow> subst s t (Let as b) = Let (apply_assn2 (subst s t) as) (subst s t b)"
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 172
apply (simp only: eqvt_def subst_graph_def)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 173
apply (rule, perm_simp, rule)
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 174
apply (rule TrueI)
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 175
apply (case_tac x)
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 176
apply (rule_tac y="c" and c="(a,b)" in trm_assn.strong_exhaust(1))
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 177
apply (auto simp add: fresh_star_def)[3]
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 178
apply (drule_tac x="assn" in meta_spec)
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 179
apply (simp add: Abs1_eq_iff alpha_bn_refl)
2938
+ − 180
apply simp_all[7]
+ − 181
prefer 2
+ − 182
apply(simp)
3192
+ − 183
using [[simproc del: alpha_lst]]
2938
+ − 184
apply(simp)
+ − 185
apply(erule conjE)+
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 186
apply (erule_tac c="(sa, ta)" in Abs_lst1_fcb2)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 187
apply (simp add: Abs_fresh_iff)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 188
apply (simp add: fresh_star_def)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 189
apply (simp_all add: fresh_star_Pair_elim perm_supp_eq eqvt_at_def)[2]
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 190
apply (simp add: bn_apply_assn2)
2938
+ − 191
apply(erule conjE)+
+ − 192
apply(rule conjI)
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 193
apply (erule_tac c="(sa, ta)" in Abs_lst_fcb2)
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 194
apply (simp add: fresh_star_def Abs_fresh_iff)
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 195
apply assumption+
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 196
apply (simp_all add: fresh_star_Pair_elim perm_supp_eq eqvt_at_def trm_assn.fv_bn_eqvt)[2]
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 197
apply (erule alpha_bn_inducts)
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 198
apply simp_all
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 199
done
2931
aaef9dec5e1d
side-by-side tests of lets with single assignment; deep-binder case works if the recursion is avoided using an auxiliary function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 200
1602
+ − 201
lemma lets_bla:
2670
+ − 202
"x \<noteq> z \<Longrightarrow> y \<noteq> z \<Longrightarrow> x \<noteq> y \<Longrightarrow>(Let (ACons x (Var y) ANil) (Var x)) \<noteq> (Let (ACons x (Var z) ANil) (Var x))"
+ − 203
by (simp add: trm_assn.eq_iff)
+ − 204
1602
+ − 205
lemma lets_ok:
2670
+ − 206
"(Let (ACons x (Var y) ANil) (Var x)) = (Let (ACons y (Var y) ANil) (Var y))"
+ − 207
apply (simp add: trm_assn.eq_iff Abs_eq_iff )
1602
+ − 208
apply (rule_tac x="(x \<leftrightarrow> y)" in exI)
2670
+ − 209
apply (simp_all add: alphas atom_eqvt supp_at_base fresh_star_def trm_assn.bn_defs trm_assn.supp)
1602
+ − 210
done
+ − 211
+ − 212
lemma lets_ok3:
+ − 213
"x \<noteq> y \<Longrightarrow>
2670
+ − 214
(Let (ACons x (App (Var y) (Var x)) (ACons y (Var y) ANil)) (App (Var x) (Var y))) \<noteq>
+ − 215
(Let (ACons y (App (Var x) (Var y)) (ACons x (Var x) ANil)) (App (Var x) (Var y)))"
+ − 216
apply (simp add: trm_assn.eq_iff)
1602
+ − 217
done
+ − 218
+ − 219
lemma lets_not_ok1:
1685
+ − 220
"x \<noteq> y \<Longrightarrow>
2670
+ − 221
(Let (ACons x (Var x) (ACons y (Var y) ANil)) (App (Var x) (Var y))) \<noteq>
+ − 222
(Let (ACons y (Var x) (ACons x (Var y) ANil)) (App (Var x) (Var y)))"
+ − 223
apply (simp add: alphas trm_assn.eq_iff trm_assn.supp fresh_star_def atom_eqvt Abs_eq_iff trm_assn.bn_defs)
1602
+ − 224
done
+ − 225
+ − 226
lemma lets_nok:
+ − 227
"x \<noteq> y \<Longrightarrow> x \<noteq> z \<Longrightarrow> z \<noteq> y \<Longrightarrow>
2670
+ − 228
(Let (ACons x (App (Var z) (Var z)) (ACons y (Var z) ANil)) (App (Var x) (Var y))) \<noteq>
+ − 229
(Let (ACons y (Var z) (ACons x (App (Var z) (Var z)) ANil)) (App (Var x) (Var y)))"
+ − 230
apply (simp add: alphas trm_assn.eq_iff fresh_star_def trm_assn.bn_defs Abs_eq_iff trm_assn.supp trm_assn.distinct)
1602
+ − 231
done
2670
+ − 232
+ − 233
lemma
+ − 234
fixes a b c :: name
+ − 235
assumes x: "a \<noteq> c" and y: "b \<noteq> c"
+ − 236
shows "\<exists>p.([atom a], Var c) \<approx>lst (op =) supp p ([atom b], Var c)"
+ − 237
apply (rule_tac x="(a \<leftrightarrow> b)" in exI)
+ − 238
apply (simp add: alphas trm_assn.supp supp_at_base x y fresh_star_def atom_eqvt)
+ − 239
by (metis Rep_name_inverse atom_name_def flip_fresh_fresh fresh_atom fresh_perm x y)
+ − 240
2932
e8ab80062061
Did the proofs of height and subst for Let with list-like binders. Having apply_assns allows proving things by alpha_bn
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
diff
changeset
+ − 241
end