ProgTutorial/Recipes/Introspection.thy
author Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:27:10 +0100
changeset 527 efe63c062e48
parent 525 92a3600e50e4
child 528 e2c0138b5cea
permissions -rw-r--r--
polished introspection section


theory Introspection
imports "../Appendix"
begin

section {* Introspection of Theorems and Proofs \label{rec:introspection} *}

text{* 
  {\bf Problem:} 
  How to obtain all theorems that are used in the proof of a theorem?\smallskip

  {\bf Solution:} They can be obtained by introspecting the theorem.\smallskip

  To introspect a theorem, let us define the following three functions that 
  analyse the @{ML_type proof_body} data-structure from the structure 
  @{ML_struct Proofterm}.
*}

ML %grayML{*fun pthms_of (PBody {thms, ...}) = map #2 thms 
val get_names = map #1 o pthms_of 
val get_pbodies = map (Future.join o #3) o pthms_of *}

text {* 
  To see what their purpose is, consider the following three short proofs.
*}

lemma my_conjIa:
  shows "A \<and> B \<Longrightarrow> A \<and> B"
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule conjunct1)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule conjunct2)
apply(assumption)
done

lemma my_conjIb:
  shows "A \<and> B \<Longrightarrow> A \<and> B"
apply(assumption)
done

lemma my_conjIc:
  shows "A \<and> B \<Longrightarrow> A \<and> B"
apply(auto)
done

text {*
  While the information about which theorems are used is obvious in
  the first two proofs, it is not obvious in the third, because of the
  @{text auto}-step.  Fortunately, ``behind'' every proved theorem is
  a proof-tree that records all theorems that are employed for
  establishing this theorem.  We can traverse this proof-tree
  extracting this information.  Let us first extract the name of the
  established theorem. This can be done with

  @{ML_response [display,gray]
  "@{thm my_conjIa}
  |> Thm.proof_body_of
  |> get_names"
  "[\"Introspection.my_conjIa\"]"}

  whereby @{text "Introspection"} refers to the theory name in which
  we established the theorem @{thm [source] my_conjIa}. The function @{ML_ind
  proof_body_of in Thm} returns a part of the data that is stored in a
  theorem.  Notice that the apply-proof of this theorem references
  three theorems, namely @{thm [source] conjI}, @{thm [source] conjunct1} 
  and @{thm [source] conjunct2}. We can obtain them by descending into the
  first level of the proof-tree, as follows.

  @{ML_response [display,gray]
  "@{thm my_conjIa}
  |> Thm.proof_body_of
  |> get_pbodies
  |> map get_names
  |> List.concat"
  "[\"HOL.conjunct2\", \"HOL.conjunct1\", \"HOL.conjI\", \"Pure.protectD\", 
  \"Pure.protectI\"]"}

  Note the theorems @{thm [source] protectD} and @{thm [source]
  protectI} that are internal theorems which are always part of a
  proof in Isabelle. Note also that applications of @{text assumption} do not
  count as a separate theorem, as you can see in the following code.

  @{ML_response [display,gray]
  "@{thm my_conjIb}
  |> Thm.proof_body_of
  |> get_pbodies
  |> map get_names
  |> List.concat"
  "[\"Pure.protectD\", \"Pure.protectI\"]"}

  Interestingly, but not surprisingly, the proof of @{thm [source]
  my_conjIc} procceeds quite differently from @{thm [source] my_conjIa}
  and @{thm [source] my_conjIb}, as can be seen next.

  @{ML_response [display,gray]
  "@{thm my_conjIc}
  |> Thm.proof_body_of
  |> get_pbodies
  |> map get_names
  |> List.concat"
  "[\"HOL.Eq_TrueI\", \"HOL.simp_thms_25\", \"HOL.eq_reflection\",
  \"HOL.conjunct2\", \"HOL.conjunct1\", \"HOL.TrueI\", \"Pure.protectD\",
  \"Pure.protectI\"]"}

  Of course we can also descend into the second level of the tree 
  ``behind'' @{thm [source] my_conjIa}, which
  means we obtain the theorems that are used in order to prove
  @{thm [source] conjunct1}, @{thm [source] conjunct2} and @{thm [source] conjI}.

  @{ML_response [display, gray]
  "@{thm my_conjIa}
  |> Thm.proof_body_of
  |> get_pbodies
  |> map get_pbodies
  |> (map o map) get_names
  |> List.concat
  |> List.concat
  |> duplicates (op=)"
  "[\"HOL.spec\", \"HOL.and_def\", \"HOL.mp\", \"HOL.impI\", \"Pure.protectD\",
  \"Pure.protectI\"]"}

  \begin{readmore} 
  The data-structure @{ML_type proof_body} is implemented
  in the file @{ML_file "Pure/proofterm.ML"}. The implementation 
  of theorems and related functions are in @{ML_file "Pure/thm.ML"}.  
  \end{readmore}
*}



end