theory Antiquotes
imports "../Base"
begin
section {* Useful Document Antiquotations *}
text {*
{\bf Problem:}
How to keep your ML-code inside a document synchronised with the actual code?\smallskip
{\bf Solution:} This can be achieved using document antiquotations.\smallskip
Document antiquotations can be used for ensuring consistent type-setting of
various entities in a document. They can also be used for sophisticated
\LaTeX-hacking. If you type @{text "Ctrl-c Ctrl-a h A"} inside ProofGeneral, you
obtain a list of all currently available document antiquotations and their options.
You obtain the same list on the ML-level by typing
@{ML [display,gray] "ThyOutput.print_antiquotations ()"}
Below we give the code for two additional antiquotations that can be used to typeset
ML-code and also to check whether the given code actually compiles. This
provides a sanity check for the code and also allows one to keep documents
in sync with other code, for example Isabelle.
We first describe the antiquotation @{text "ML_checked"} with the syntax:
@{text [display] "@{ML_checked \"a_piece_of_code\"}"}
The code is checked by sending the ML-expression @{text [quotes] "val _ =
a_piece_of_code"} to the ML-compiler (i.e.~the function @{ML
"ML_Context.eval_in"} in Line 4 below). The complete code of the
antiquotation is as follows:
*}
ML%linenosgray{*fun ml_val code_txt = "val _ = " ^ code_txt
fun output_ml {context = ctxt, ...} code_txt =
(ML_Context.eval_in (SOME ctxt) false Position.none (ml_val code_txt);
ThyOutput.output (map Pretty.str (space_explode "\n" code_txt)))
val _ = ThyOutput.antiquotation "ML_checked" (Scan.lift Args.name) output_ml*}
text {*
The parser @{ML "(Scan.lift Args.name)"} in line 9 parses a string,
in this case the code. As mentioned before, the code
is sent to the ML-compiler in the line 4 using the function @{ML ml_val},
which constructs the appropriate ML-expression.
If the code is ``approved'' by the compiler, then the output function @{ML
"ThyOutput.output"} in the next line pretty prints the
code. This function expects that the code is a list of (pretty)strings where each
string correspond to a line in the output. Therefore the use of
@{ML "(space_explode \"\\n\" txt)" for txt}
which produces this list according to linebreaks. There are a number of options
for antiquotations that are observed by @{ML ThyOutput.output} when printing the
code (including @{text "[display]"} and @{text "[quotes]"}). Line 7 sets
up the new antiquotation.
\begin{readmore}
For more information about options of antiquotations see \rsccite{sec:antiq}).
\end{readmore}
Since we used the argument @{ML "Position.none"}, the compiler cannot give specific
information about the line number, in case an error is detected. We
can improve the code above slightly by writing
*}
ML%linenosgray{*fun output_ml {context = ctxt, ...} (code_txt, pos) =
(ML_Context.eval_in (SOME ctxt) false pos (ml_val code_txt);
ThyOutput.output (map Pretty.str (space_explode "\n" code_txt)))
val _ = ThyOutput.antiquotation "ML_checked"
(Scan.lift (OuterParse.position Args.name)) output_ml *}
text {*
where in Lines 1 and 2 the positional information is properly treated. The
parser @{ML OuterParse.position} encodes the positional information in the
result.
We can now write in a document @{text "@{ML_checked \"2 + 3\"}"} in order to
obtain @{ML_checked "2 + 3"} and be sure that this code compiles until
somebody changes the definition of \mbox{@{ML "(op +)"}}.
The second antiquotation we describe extends the first by a pattern that
specifies what the result of the ML-code should be and check
the consistency of the actual result with the given pattern. For this we are going
to implement the antiquotation
@{text [display] "@{ML_resp \"a_piece_of_code\" \"a_pattern\"}"}
To add some convenience and also to deal with large outputs, the user can
give a partial specification inside the pattern by giving abbreviations of
the form @{text [quotes] "\<dots>"}. For example @{text "(\<dots>, \<dots>)"} to specify a
pair.
Whereas in the antiquotation @{text "@{ML_checked \"piece_of_code\"}"}
above, we have sent the expression @{text [quotes] "val _ = piece_of_code"}
to the compiler, in the second the wildcard @{text "_"} we will be replaced
by the given pattern. To do this we need to replace the @{text [quotes] "\<dots>"}
by @{text [quotes] "_"} before sending the code to the compiler. The
following function will do this:
*}
ML{*fun ml_pat (code_txt, pat) =
let val pat' =
implode (map (fn "\<dots>" => "_" | s => s) (Symbol.explode pat))
in
"val " ^ pat' ^ " = " ^ code_txt
end*}
text {*
Next we like to add a response indicator to the result using:
*}
ML{*fun add_resp_indicator pat =
map (fn s => "> " ^ s) (space_explode "\n" pat) *}
text {*
The rest of the code of the antiquotation is
*}
ML{*fun output_ml_resp {context = ctxt, ...} ((code_txt, pat), pos) =
(ML_Context.eval_in (SOME ctxt) false pos (ml_pat (code_txt, pat));
let
val output = (space_explode "\n" code_txt) @ (add_resp_indicator pat)
in
ThyOutput.output (map Pretty.str output)
end)
val _ = ThyOutput.antiquotation "ML_resp"
(Scan.lift (OuterParse.position (Args.name -- Args.name)))
output_ml_resp*}
text {*
This extended antiquotation allows us to write
@{text [display] "@{ML_resp [display] \"true andalso false\" \"false\"}"}
to obtain
@{ML_resp [display] "true andalso false" "false"}
or
@{text [display] "@{ML_resp [display] \"let val i = 3 in (i * i, \"foo\") end\" \"(9, \<dots>)\"}"}
to obtain
@{ML_resp [display] "let val i = 3 in (i * i, \"foo\") end" "(9, \<dots>)"}
In both cases, the check by the compiler ensures that code and result
match. A limitation of this antiquotation, however, is that the pattern can
only be given for values that can be constructed. This excludes
values that are abstract datatypes, like theorems or cterms.
*}
end