CookBook/Recipes/Antiquotes.thy
author Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de>
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:52:51 +0100
changeset 188 8939b8fd8603
parent 175 7c09bd3227c5
permissions -rw-r--r--
added lots of FIXMES


theory Antiquotes
imports "../Base"
begin


section {* Useful Document Antiquotations *}

text {*
  (FIXME: update to to new antiquotation setup)

  {\bf Problem:} 
  How to keep your ML-code inside a document synchronised with the actual code?\smallskip

  {\bf Solution:} This can be achieved using document antiquotations.\smallskip

  Document antiquotations can be used for ensuring consistent type-setting of
  various entities in a document. They can also be used for sophisticated
  \LaTeX-hacking. If you type @{text "Ctrl-c Ctrl-a h A"} inside ProofGeneral, you
  obtain a list of all currently available document antiquotations and their options.
  You obtain the same list on the ML-level by typing

  @{ML [display,gray] "ThyOutput.print_antiquotations ()"}

  Below we give the code for two additional document antiquotations that can
  be used to typeset ML-code and also to check whether the given code actually
  compiles. This provides a sanity check for the code and also allows one to
  keep documents in sync with other code, for example Isabelle.

  We first describe the antiquotation @{text "ML_checked"} with the syntax:
 
  @{text [display] "@{ML_checked \"a_piece_of_code\"}"}

  The code is checked by sending the ML-expression @{text [quotes] "val _ =
  a_piece_of_code"} to the ML-compiler (i.e.~the function @{ML
  "ML_Context.eval_in"} in Line 4 below). The complete code of the
  document antiquotation is as follows:

*}

ML%linenosgray{*fun ml_val code_txt = "val _ = " ^ code_txt

fun output_ml {context = ctxt, ...} code_txt =
  (ML_Context.eval_in (SOME ctxt) false Position.none (ml_val code_txt); 
   ThyOutput.output (map Pretty.str (space_explode "\n" code_txt)))

val _ = ThyOutput.antiquotation "ML_checked" (Scan.lift Args.name) output_ml*}

text {*
  The parser @{ML "(Scan.lift Args.name)"} in line 9 parses a string, in this
  case the code. As mentioned before, the code is sent to the ML-compiler in
  the line 4 using the function @{ML ml_val}, which constructs the appropriate
  ML-expression.  If the code is ``approved'' by the compiler, then the output
  function @{ML "ThyOutput.output"} in the next line pretty prints the
  code. This function expects that the code is a list of (pretty)strings where
  each string correspond to a line in the output. Therefore the use of @{ML
  "(space_explode \"\\n\" txt)" for txt} which produces this list according to
  linebreaks.  There are a number of options for antiquotations that are
  observed by @{ML ThyOutput.output} when printing the code (including @{text
  "[display]"} and @{text "[quotes]"}). Line 7 sets up the new document
  antiquotation.


  \begin{readmore}
  For more information about options of document antiquotations see \rsccite{sec:antiq}).
  \end{readmore}

  Since we used the argument @{ML "Position.none"}, the compiler cannot give specific 
  information about the line number, in case an error is detected. We 
  can improve the code above slightly by writing 
*}

ML%linenosgray{*fun output_ml {context = ctxt, ...} (code_txt, pos) =
  (ML_Context.eval_in (SOME ctxt) false pos (ml_val code_txt);
   ThyOutput.output (map Pretty.str (space_explode "\n" code_txt)))

val _ = ThyOutput.antiquotation "ML_checked"
         (Scan.lift (OuterParse.position Args.name)) output_ml *}

text {*
  where in Lines 1 and 2 the positional information is properly treated. The
  parser @{ML OuterParse.position} encodes the positional information in the 
  result.

  We can now write in a document @{text "@{ML_checked \"2 + 3\"}"} in order to
  obtain @{ML_checked "2 + 3"} and be sure that this code compiles until
  somebody changes the definition of \mbox{@{ML "(op +)"}}.


  The second document antiquotation we describe extends the first by a pattern
  that specifies what the result of the ML-code should be and check the
  consistency of the actual result with the given pattern. For this we are
  going to implement the document antiquotation

  
  @{text [display] "@{ML_resp \"a_piece_of_code\" \"a_pattern\"}"}
  
  To add some convenience and also to deal with large outputs, the user can
  give a partial specification inside the pattern by giving abbreviations of
  the form @{text [quotes] "\<dots>"}. For example @{text "(\<dots>, \<dots>)"} for specifying a
  pair.

  In the document antiquotation @{text "@{ML_checked \"piece_of_code\"}"}
  above we have sent the expression @{text [quotes] "val _ = piece_of_code"}
  to the compiler, now instead the wildcard @{text "_"} we will be replaced by
  the given pattern. To do this we need to replace in the input the @{text
  [quotes] "\<dots>"} by @{text [quotes] "_"} before sending the code to the
  compiler. The following function will do this:
*}

ML{*fun ml_pat (code_txt, pat) =
let val pat' = 
         implode (map (fn "\<dots>" => "_" | s => s) (Symbol.explode pat))
in 
  "val " ^ pat' ^ " = " ^ code_txt 
end*}

text {* 
  Next we like to add a response indicator to the result using:
*}


ML{*fun add_resp pat = map (fn s => "> " ^ s) pat*}

text {* 
  The rest of the code of the document antiquotation is
*}

ML{*fun output_ml_resp {context = ctxt, ...} ((code_txt, pat), pos) = 
  (ML_Context.eval_in (SOME ctxt) false pos (ml_pat (code_txt, pat));
   let 
     val output1 = space_explode "\n" code_txt 
     val output2 = add_resp (space_explode "\n" pat)
   in 
     ThyOutput.output (map Pretty.str (output1 @ output2)) 
   end)

val _ = ThyOutput.antiquotation "ML_resp" 
         (Scan.lift (OuterParse.position (Args.name -- Args.name))) 
           output_ml_resp*}

text {*
  This extended document antiquotation allows us to write
 
  @{text [display] "@{ML_resp [display] \"true andalso false\" \"false\"}"}

  to obtain

  @{ML_resp [display] "true andalso false" "false"} 

  or 

  @{text [display] "@{ML_resp [display] \"let val i = 3 in (i * i, \"foo\") end\" \"(9, \<dots>)\"}"}
  
  to obtain

  @{ML_resp [display] "let val i = 3 in (i * i, \"foo\") end" "(9, \<dots>)"} 

  In both cases, the check by the compiler ensures that code and result
  match. A limitation of this document antiquotation, however, is that the
  pattern can only be given for values that can be constructed. This excludes
  values that are abstract datatypes, like @{ML_type thm}s and @{ML_type cterm}s.

*}
end