--- a/ProgTutorial/Tactical.thy	Sat Jan 21 15:18:38 2012 +0000
+++ b/ProgTutorial/Tactical.thy	Sat Jan 21 15:35:47 2012 +0000
@@ -2114,7 +2114,6 @@
   If we get hold of the ``raw'' representation of the produced theorem, 
   we obtain the expected result.
 
-
   @{ML_response [display,gray]
 "let
   val add = @{cterm \"\<lambda>x y. x + (y::nat)\"}
@@ -2128,6 +2127,24 @@
   (Abs (\"x\",\<dots>,Abs (\"y\",\<dots>,\<dots>)) $\<dots>$\<dots>) $ 
     (Const (\"Groups.plus_class.plus\",\<dots>) $ \<dots> $ \<dots>)"} 
 
+  or in the pretty-printed form
+
+  @{ML_response_fake [display,gray]
+"let
+  val add = @{cterm \"\<lambda>x y. x + (y::nat)\"}
+  val two = @{cterm \"2::nat\"}
+  val ten = @{cterm \"10::nat\"}
+  val ctrm = Thm.capply (Thm.capply add two) ten
+  val ctxt = @{context}
+    |> Config.put eta_contract false 
+    |> Config.put show_abbrevs false 
+in
+  Thm.prop_of (Thm.beta_conversion true ctrm)
+  |> pretty_term ctxt
+  |> pwriteln
+end"
+"(\<lambda>x y. x + y) 2 10 \<equiv> 2 + 10"}
+
   The argument @{ML true} in @{ML beta_conversion in Thm} indicates that 
   the right-hand side should be fully beta-normalised. If instead 
   @{ML false} is given, then only a single beta-reduction is performed