etnms/etnms.tex
changeset 102 9c3c118896bb
parent 101 4a327e70d538
child 103 aeb0bc2d1812
equal deleted inserted replaced
101:4a327e70d538 102:9c3c118896bb
   364 inside then we get $(_{00}\ONE +_{011}a^*)$, exactly the 
   364 inside then we get $(_{00}\ONE +_{011}a^*)$, exactly the 
   365 same as that of $\rup\backslash \, s$. And this difference 
   365 same as that of $\rup\backslash \, s$. And this difference 
   366 does not matter when we try to apply $\bmkeps$ or $\retrieve$
   366 does not matter when we try to apply $\bmkeps$ or $\retrieve$
   367 to it.\\
   367 to it.\\
   368 If we look into the difference above, we could see why:
   368 If we look into the difference above, we could see why:
   369 
   369 during the first derivative operation, 
       
   370 $\rup\backslash a=(_0\ONE  + \ZERO)(_0a  +  _1a^*)$ gets into a sequence
       
   371 with the first part being nullable, but not the second part.
       
   372 and we can use this to construct a set of examples based 
       
   373 on this type of behaviour of two operations.
   370 that is to say, despite the bits are being moved around on the regular expression
   374 that is to say, despite the bits are being moved around on the regular expression
   371 (difference in bits), the structure of the (unannotated)regular expression
   375 (difference in bits), the structure of the (unannotated)regular expression
   372 after one simplification is exactly the same after the 
   376 after one simplification is exactly the same after the 
   373 same sequence of derivative operations 
   377 same sequence of derivative operations 
   374 regardless of whether we did simplification
   378 regardless of whether we did simplification