# HG changeset patch
# User Christian Urban <christian.urban@kcl.ac.uk>
# Date 1726770112 -3600
# Node ID 2ecd511e62faa510ec20aec6d9e0b346a55554b6
# Parent  4543807efe9d54a5349541e97bf383855e01d287
 texupdate

diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw01.pdf
Binary file hws/hw01.pdf has changed
diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw02.pdf
Binary file hws/hw02.pdf has changed
diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw03.pdf
Binary file hws/hw03.pdf has changed
diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw04.pdf
Binary file hws/hw04.pdf has changed
diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw05.pdf
Binary file hws/hw05.pdf has changed
diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw05.tex
--- a/hws/hw05.tex	Thu Sep 19 16:32:26 2024 +0100
+++ b/hws/hw05.tex	Thu Sep 19 19:21:52 2024 +0100
@@ -56,6 +56,22 @@
 %where the three dots stand for arbitrary characters, but not
 %comment delimiters.
 
+\item The \emph{not}-regular expression is definitely useful for recognising
+  comments for example, but can
+  sometimes be quite unintuitive when it comes to deciding which strings are
+  matched or not. Consider
+
+  \[
+  (\sim{}a)^*  \quad\text{and}\quad \sim{}(a^*)\;.  
+  \]  
+
+  What is the language of each regular expression?
+
+  \solution{
+    The first one is ``all strings, except $[a]$''; the second
+    ``all strings except strings of the form $a^*$''.
+  }
+  
 \item Define the following regular expressions 
 
 \begin{center}
diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw06.pdf
Binary file hws/hw06.pdf has changed
diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw07.pdf
Binary file hws/hw07.pdf has changed
diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw08.pdf
Binary file hws/hw08.pdf has changed
diff -r 4543807efe9d -r 2ecd511e62fa hws/hw09.pdf
Binary file hws/hw09.pdf has changed