\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{../style}

\usepackage{../graphics}

\begin{document}

\section*{Homework 3}

%\HEADER

\begin{enumerate}

\item The regular expression matchers in Java, Python and Ruby can be

  very slow with some (basic) regular expressions. What is the main

  reason for this inefficient computation?

  \solution{Many matchers employ DFS type of algorithms to check

    if a string is matched by the regex or not. Such algorithms

    require backtracking if have gone down the wrong path which

    can be very slow. There are also problems with bounded regular

  expressions and backreferences.}

\item What is a regular language? Are there alternative ways

      to define this notion? If yes, give an explanation why

      they define the same notion.

      \solution{A regular language is a language for which every string

        can be recognized by some regular expression. Another definition is

        that it is a language for which a finite automaton can be

        constructed. Both define the same set of languages.}   

\item Why is every finite set of strings a regular language?

  \solution{Take a regex composed of all strings (works for finite languages)}

\item Assume you have an alphabet consisting of the letters

      $a$, $b$ and $c$ only. (1) Find a regular expression

      that recognises the two strings $ab$ and $ac$. (2) Find

      a regular expression that matches all strings

      \emph{except} these two strings. Note, you can only use

      regular expressions of the form

  \begin{center} $r ::=

    \ZERO \;|\; \ONE \;|\; c \;|\; r_1 + r_2 \;|\;

    r_1 \cdot r_2 \;|\; r^*$ 

  \end{center}

%\item Define the function \textit{zeroable} which takes a

%      regular expression as argument and returns a boolean.

%      The function should satisfy the following property:

%

%  \begin{center}

%    $\textit{zeroable(r)} \;\text{if and only if}\; 

%    L(r) = \{\}$

%  \end{center}

  \solution{Done in the video but there I forgot to include the empty string.}

\item Given the alphabet $\{a,b\}$. Draw the automaton that has two

  states, say $Q_0$ and $Q_1$.  The starting state is $Q_0$ and the

  final state is $Q_1$. The transition function is given by

  \begin{center}

    \begin{tabular}{l}

      $(Q_0, a) \rightarrow Q_0$\\

      $(Q_0, b) \rightarrow Q_1$\\

      $(Q_1, b) \rightarrow Q_1$

    \end{tabular}

  \end{center}

  What is the language recognised by this automaton?

\item Give a non-deterministic finite automaton that can

  recognise the language $L(a\cdot (a + b)^* \cdot c)$.

  \solution{It is already possible to just read off the automaton without

  going through Thompson.}

\item Given a deterministic finite automaton $A(\varSigma, Q, Q_0, F,

      \delta)$, define which language is recognised by this

      automaton. Can you define also the language defined by a

      non-deterministic automaton?

      \solution{

        A formula for DFAs is

        \[L(A) \dn \{s \;|\; \hat{\delta}(start_q, s) \in F\}\]

        For NFAs you need to first define what $\hat{\rho}$ means. If

        $\rho$ is given as a relation, you can define:

        \[

          \hat{\rho}(qs, []) \dn qs \qquad

          \hat{\rho}(qs, c::s) \dn \bigcup_{q\in qs} \{ q' \; | \; \rho(q, c, q')\}

        \]

        This ``collects'' all the states reachable in a breadth-first

        manner. Once you have all the states reachable by an NFA, you can define

        the language as

        \[

        L(N) \dn \{s \;|\; \hat{\rho}(qs_{start}, s) \cap F \not= \emptyset\}

        \]  

        Here you test whether the all states reachable (for $s$) contain at least

        a single accepting state.

      }

\item Given the following deterministic finite automaton over

      the alphabet $\{a, b\}$, find an automaton that

      recognises the complement language. (Hint: Recall that

      for the algorithm from the lectures, the automaton needs

      to be in completed form, that is have a transition for

      every letter from the alphabet.)

      \solution{

        Before exchanging accepting and non-accepting states, it is important that

        the automaton is completed (meaning has a transition for every letter

        of the alphabet). If not completed, you have to introduce a sink state.

        For fun you can try out the example without

        completion: Then the original automaton can recognise

        strings of the form $a$, $ab...b$; but the ``uncompleted'' automaton would

        recognise only the empty string.

      }

  \begin{center}

    \begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth',very thick,auto,

                        every state/.style={minimum size=0pt,

                        inner sep=2pt,draw=blue!50,very thick,

                        fill=blue!20},scale=2]

      \node[state, initial]        (q0) at ( 0,1) {$Q_0$};

      \node[state, accepting]  (q1) at ( 1,1) {$Q_1$};

      \path[->] (q0) edge node[above] {$a$} (q1)

                (q1) edge [loop right] node {$b$} ();

    \end{tikzpicture}

  \end{center}

%\item Given the following deterministic finite automaton

%

%\begin{center}

%\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=3, line width=0.7mm]

%  \node[state, initial]        (q0) at ( 0,1) {$q_0$};

%  \node[state,accepting]  (q1) at ( 1,1) {$q_1$};

%  \node[state, accepting] (q2) at ( 2,1) {$q_2$};

%  \path[->] (q0) edge node[above] {$b$} (q1)

%                  (q1) edge [loop above] node[above] {$a$} ()

%                  (q2) edge [loop above] node[above] {$a, b$} ()

%                  (q1) edge node[above] {$b$} (q2)

%                  (q0) edge[bend right] node[below] {$a$} (q2)

%                  ;

%\end{tikzpicture}

%\end{center}

%find the corresponding minimal automaton. State clearly which nodes

%can be merged.

\item Given the following non-deterministic finite automaton

      over the alphabet $\{a, b\}$, find a deterministic

      finite automaton that recognises the same language:

  \begin{center}

    \begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth',very thick,auto,

                        every state/.style={minimum size=0pt,

                        inner sep=2pt,draw=blue!50,very thick,

                        fill=blue!20},scale=2]

      \node[state, initial]        (q0) at ( 0,1) {$Q_0$};

      \node[state]                    (q1) at ( 1,1) {$Q_1$};

      \node[state, accepting] (q2) at ( 2,1) {$Q_2$};

      \path[->] (q0) edge node[above] {$a$} (q1)

                (q0) edge [loop above] node[above] {$b$} ()

                (q0) edge [loop below] node[below] {$a$} ()

                (q1) edge node[above] {$a$} (q2);

    \end{tikzpicture}

  \end{center}

\item %%\textbf{(Deleted for 2017, 2018, 2019)}

  Given the following deterministic finite automaton over the

  alphabet $\{0, 1\}$, find the corresponding minimal automaton. In

  case states can be merged, state clearly which states can be merged.

  \begin{center}

    \begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth',very thick,auto,

                        every state/.style={minimum size=0pt,

                        inner sep=2pt,draw=blue!50,very thick,

                        fill=blue!20},scale=2]

      \node[state, initial]        (q0) at ( 0,1) {$Q_0$};

      \node[state]                    (q1) at ( 1,1) {$Q_1$};

      \node[state, accepting] (q4) at ( 2,1) {$Q_4$};

      \node[state]                    (q2) at (0.5,0) {$Q_2$};

      \node[state]                    (q3) at (1.5,0) {$Q_3$};

      \path[->] (q0) edge node[above] {$0$} (q1)

                (q0) edge node[right] {$1$} (q2)

                (q1) edge node[above] {$0$} (q4)

                (q1) edge node[right] {$1$} (q2)

                (q2) edge node[above] {$0$} (q3)

                (q2) edge [loop below] node {$1$} ()

                (q3) edge node[left] {$0$} (q4)

                (q3) edge [bend left=95, looseness = 2.2] node [left=2mm] {$1$} (q0)

                (q4) edge [loop right] node {$0, 1$} ();

    \end{tikzpicture}

  \end{center}

  \solution{Q0 and Q2 can be merged; and Q1 and Q3 as well}

\item Given the following finite deterministic automaton over the alphabet $\{a, b\}$:

  \begin{center}

    \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2,>=stealth',very thick,auto,

                        every state/.style={minimum size=0pt,

                        inner sep=2pt,draw=blue!50,very thick,

                        fill=blue!20}]

      \node[state, initial, accepting]        (q0) at ( 0,1) {$Q_0$};

      \node[state, accepting]                    (q1) at ( 1,1) {$Q_1$};

      \node[state] (q2) at ( 2,1) {$Q_2$};

      \path[->] (q0) edge[bend left] node[above] {$a$} (q1)

                (q1) edge[bend left] node[above] {$b$} (q0)

                (q2) edge[bend left=50] node[below] {$b$} (q0)

                (q1) edge node[above] {$a$} (q2)

                (q2) edge [loop right] node {$a$} ()

                (q0) edge [loop below] node {$b$} ()

            ;

    \end{tikzpicture}

  \end{center}

  Give a regular expression that can recognise the same language as

  this automaton. (Hint: If you use Brzozwski's method, you can assume

  Arden's lemma which states that an equation of the form $q = q\cdot r + s$

  has the unique solution $q = s \cdot r^*$.)

\item If a non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) has

  $n$ states. How many states does a deterministic 

  automaton (DFA) that can recognise the same language

  as the NFA maximal need?

  \solution{$2^n$ in the worst-case and for some regexes the worst case

    cannot be avoided. 

    Other comments: $r^{\{n\}}$ can only be represented as $n$

    copies of the automaton for $r$, which can explode the automaton for bounded

    regular expressions. Similarly, we have no idea how backreferences can be

    represented as automaton.

  }

\item Rust implements a non-backtracking regular expression matcher

  based on the classic idea of DFAs. Still, some regular expressions

  take a surprising amount of time for matching problems. Explain the

  problem?

  \solution{The problem has to do with bounded regular expressions,

    such as $r^{\{n\}}$. They are represented as $n$-copies of some

    automaton for $r$. If $n$ is large, then this can result in a

    large memory-footprint and slow runtime.}

\item Prove that for all regular expressions $r$ we have

\begin{center} 

  $\textit{nullable}(r) \quad \text{if and only if} 

  \quad [] \in L(r)$ 

\end{center}

      Write down clearly in each case what you need to prove

      and what are the assumptions. 

\item \POSTSCRIPT  

\end{enumerate}

\end{document}

%%% Local Variables: 

%%% mode: latex

%%% TeX-master: t

%%% End: